Long pages
From The Embassy of Good Science
50 s ordered by recently added
- (hist) University of Oslo's Policy on Fraudulent Documents [735 bytes]
- (hist) Divorce study felled by a coding error gets a second chance [735 bytes]
- (hist) The Case of the Damaged Baby [734 bytes]
- (hist) Hidden for a century, 'fake' is actually a Van Gogh [734 bytes]
- (hist) Studying Vulnerable Individuals [734 bytes]
- (hist) The Ethical Challenges of Field Research in Conflict Zones [733 bytes]
- (hist) Whistle blowing [733 bytes]
- (hist) Mentoring International Post Docs [733 bytes]
- (hist) One PhD student, a retraction, and an unconvincing rebuttal [732 bytes]
- (hist) The Environmental Impact of Physical Devices [732 bytes]
- (hist) Bias in Historical Description, Interpretation, and Explanation [732 bytes]
- (hist) What do journal editors do when they suspect research misconduct? [732 bytes]
- (hist) PRINTEGER [729 bytes]
- (hist) A systematic approach to instruction in research ethics [729 bytes]
- (hist) Fostering integrity in postgraduate research: an evidence-based policy and support framework [728 bytes]
- (hist) Teaching Controversial Issues [727 bytes]
- (hist) Research ethics in emerging forms of online learning: Issues arising from a hypothetical study on a MOOC [727 bytes]
- (hist) Guidelines for Evaluating Work in Digital Humanities and Digital Media [727 bytes]
- (hist) CONCISE [727 bytes]
- (hist) Authorship and Intellectual Property [726 bytes]
- (hist) How can we provide effective training for research ethics committee members? A European assessment [726 bytes]
- (hist) Statistical reviewers improve reporting in biomedical articles: a randomized trial [726 bytes]
- (hist) Where are they now? [725 bytes]
- (hist) Avoiding Plagiarism, Self-plagiarism, and Other Questionable Writing Practices: A Guide to Ethical Writing [725 bytes]
- (hist) 3 things societies can do to promote research integrity [725 bytes]
- (hist) Academic research record-keeping: best practices for individuals, group leaders, and institutions [724 bytes]
- (hist) Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition [724 bytes]
- (hist) Preparing whistleblowers for reporting research misconduct [724 bytes]
- (hist) Reflexive Principlism as an Effective Approach for Developing Ethical Reasoning in Engineering [723 bytes]
- (hist) Institutional dealing with scientific misconduct [723 bytes]
- (hist) Cases. Research Ethics Training Virtual Course [722 bytes]
- (hist) Virtue ethics, positive psychology, and a new model of science and engineering ethics education. [722 bytes]
- (hist) An empirical research study of the efficacy of two plagiarism-detection applications [720 bytes]
- (hist) Journal peer review [720 bytes]
- (hist) The Croatian Committee for Ethics in Science and Higher Education's Rules of Procedure of the Ethics Committee. [718 bytes]
- (hist) Payment in different contexts: How can payment reflect local considerations? [717 bytes]
- (hist) Pirated Idea for Research [717 bytes]
- (hist) Are these data real? Statistical methods for the detection of data fabrication in clinical trials [717 bytes]
- (hist) Academic integrity checklist [716 bytes]
- (hist) Integrating Ethics Into a Research Experience for Undergraduates [715 bytes]
- (hist) Misconduct: the stars who fell to earth [714 bytes]
- (hist) Bias in hiring [712 bytes]
- (hist) Misconduct? It's all academic [711 bytes]
- (hist) Data Privacy & Security Global Coronavirus Toolkit [711 bytes]
- (hist) RCR Casebook [710 bytes]
- (hist) Dublin City University's Position Statement on Open Access to Research Publications [709 bytes]
- (hist) Teaching students to study online communities ethically [709 bytes]
- (hist) Seven Ways to Plagiarise: Another Magazine Surprise [706 bytes]
- (hist) Encouraging accountability in research: a pilot assessment of training efforts [706 bytes]
- (hist) The Danish Act on the Innovation Fund [705 bytes]
