Why is this important? (Important Because)
From The Embassy of Good Science
A description to provide more focus to the theme/resource (max. 200 words)
- ⧼SA Foundation Data Type⧽: Text
E
Ethical Issues in Developing Pharmacogenetic Research Partnerships With American Indigenous Communities +
It shows two specific cases of having informed consent about further use of research samples are taken for granted. It also provides a brief overview of the legal procedure that affected communities can follow in The United States, and possible rulling of the courte in these cases. +
Psychology is commited to improve the condition of individuals and society. To do so, standards and principles are needed to encourage ethical behaviour in psychology professional practice. +
Currently, citizen science is becoming more and more important in different fields of science. For example, in natural sciences, it enables large-scale data collection by involving a vast number of individuals which would be challenging to achieve for traditional research methods within the same timeframe and resources. This training will guide you through the crucial elements of responsible citizen science, including protection of human research participants, plants, animals and ecosystems; rights of citizen scientists; conflicts of interest; quality of research outputs etc. By the end of this training, you will gain a deeper understanding of responsible open science and acquire the following skills and attitudes necessary for responsible practising of citizen science: +
Ethical code of the Slovak Academy of Sciences' is important because it ensures credibility and trust in research by providing both preventive and corrective guidance. It prevents misconduct by educating researchers on standards, and offers frameworks for addressing violations fairly. In today’s interconnected research environment, having shared ethical codes strengthens international collaboration and consistency. For governments, institutions, and the public, this document demonstrates commitment to transparency, fairness, and societal responsibility. It is not just a guideline but a foundation for safeguarding the reliability of research outcomes. +
Ethics Framework and Guidelines for Participatory Processes in the Activities of Research Funding Organizations +
<div>RFOs play a fundamental role in the opening up of research to broader audiences, and are crucial in determining research agendas at a local, national and international level. As such, it is a good thing that RFOs want to involve more (and broader) groups in participation - but involving these groups in an ethical way raises new issues and questions. These guidelines exist as a tool for safeguarding the ethics, effectiveness and justification of stakeholder participation.</div><div></div> +
The complex and important topic of ethics that is crucial for researchers' everyday work is broken down to short videos. Those can be used to educate yourself or for training. Because everybody has different opinions, perspectives and experiences, talking about ethics and defining key terms is important. +
Discipline specific guidance can aid researchers in the area of SSH to conduct research ethically and with integrity. +
Digital psychiatry is reshaping mental health care by increasing accessibility and offering new treatment tools. However, significant ethical dilemmas arise, including the risk of AI bias, potential breaches of privacy, the impact of digital therapies on traditional face-to-face care, and concerns over data security. Without strong rules and oversight, many questions remain. Understanding these issues is critical for ensuring that digital psychiatry develops in a way that respects human rights, safeguards vulnerable populations, and ensure fair access to mental health care. +
The number of vaccine development trials that take place in low and lower-middle income countries increases.'"`UNIQ--ref-00000010-QINU`"' With this increase in vaccine trials, the risk of exploitation of the local communities also rises. It is important to avoid exploitation and respect the right of autonomy of the research subjects. Therefore, identification of the important ethical issues and the human rights at stake is needed. In this manner, the analysis presented in the current case may be the first step towards policies and regulations that protect the rights of inhabitants of low and lower-middle income countries where vaccine trials take place.
'"`UNIQ--references-00000011-QINU`"' +
This code of conduct lays out the ways in which those affiliated with the EAACI should behave in order to support the broader goals of the society. +
This code of conduct outlines standards of conduct for members of the EAA to follow in fulfilling their responsibilities, both to the community and to their professional colleagues. +
This code of conduct outlines standards of conduct for fieldwork training for archaeologists in Europe. +
European Association of Archaeologists (EAA) Principles of Conduct for Archaeologists involved in Contract Archaeological Work +
This code of conduct outlines standards of conduct for archaeologists involved in contract work in Europe. +
Via their code of conduct, the EASP outlines the policies that apply to those participating in EASP activities, particularly with regards to professionalism and non-discrimination. +
This code of conduct lays out ethical standards for the behaviour of those affiliated with the EAS, and astronomers in Europe more generally. +
In four different parts, the charter highlights universal and inalienable rights of individuals, the rights of patients, the rights of active citizenship and promotes guidelines for their implementation. This charter requires the engagement of a variety of stakeholders like health care professionals, governments, administrative bodies, etc. +
The document 'European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity', developed in 2023 in Europe, is a international guideline that addresses the principles of research integrity. Authored by ALLEA (European Federation of Academies of Sciences and Humanities), and available in English, it targets the research community in Europe. It provides clear expectations for responsible conduct in research and defines practices that safeguard honesty, transparency, and accountability. The text outlines responsibilities of both individual researchers and institutions. It identifies misconduct such as plagiarism, data falsification, fabrication, and unethical authorship, while also promoting good practices in publication, peer review, and collaborative research. It emphasizes effective data management, openness in reporting, and respect for colleagues, participants, and the wider community. Institutions are encouraged to create supportive environments through policies, training, and oversight mechanisms. +
Adopted in 2012, this code of conduct outline general principles of scientific research and clinical practice for those who participate in the activities of the ECNP. +
Time invested in ethical self-assessment will improve the quality and rigour of the research methods and ensure the research proposal adhears to ethical standards. +
Protecting vulnerable research subjects is fundamental to perform research ethically. +
