Approved revisions
From The Embassy of Good Science
View list of: Pages whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved pages | All pages with an approved revision | Pages with invalid approvals | Files whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved files | All files with an approved revision | Files with invalid approvals
50 ss ordered by recently added
- Emerging Infectious Diseases. Author Checklist
- Teaching Controversial Issues
- Office of Science and Technology Policy Memorandum on Open Access (2022), Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP)
- Declaración de la Alhambra sobre acceso abierto (2010), Fundación Española para la Ciencia y la Tecnología (FECYT) and Consortium of Southern European Libraries
- US Office of Research Integrity
- The university and the responsible conduct of research: who is responsible for what?
- Mentoring: failure
- On Being a Scientist: A Guide to Responsible Conduct in Research
- Imagine RRI. A card-based method for reflecting on responsibility in life science research
- Ethical Guidelines for Good Research Practice
- POIESIS Recommendations 7, 8, 9: Science Communication and Chains of Mediation
- Publication and data ownership
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Magazine Surprise
- Trustworthy, Reliable and Engaging Scientific Communication Approaches
- Respondent Confidentiality
- A Short Guide to the Digital Humanities
- HEADT Centre: An Introduction to Research Integrity
- Fake science: Who's to blame when the media gets research wrong?
- AI Ethics and Governance in Practice: AI Fairness in Practice
- From Case Management to Prevention of Scientific Dishonesty in Denmark
- Framework to Enhance Research Integrity in Research Collaborations
- The Trust Code Supplement - A Global Code of Conduct for Research in Fragile Settings
- On Goffman: Ethnography and the Ethics of Care
- Population Health Data Implementation Guide (Deliverable 7.1)
- Research culture
- VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science Producers
- Recommendations of the Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK for Research Integrity Advisers and related background organisations1
- Fabrication and falsification
- The Nutty Professor
- Ethics unwrapped collection
- Simultaneous Submission Leading to Duplicate Publication
- Data Sharing in Ongoing Projects
- Deception by Research Participants
- Would You Do a Post Doc with this Guy?
- The Irreproducibility Crisis of Modern Science
- It’s Time to Get Serious About Research Fraud
- Training materials
- Head of research integrity initiative in China alleged of reseach misconduct
- Ethics defined: a glossary
- Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project
- Preprints. Instructions for Authors
- VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science Implementers
- Good-Practice Guide for Scientific-Academic Publishing (CSIC, Spain)
- The Ethics of Collecting Genetic Data From Indigenous People
- Irish National Forum on Research Integrity's Position Paper on Research Integrity & Research Ethics
- CAS Issues Open Access Policy (2014), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS)
- Gluten-free turkeys? Paper on dangers of wheat-based diet in birds retracted
- The RESPECT Code of Practice for Socioeconomic Research
- FDA Inspections Revealing Research Misconduct Hidden from Public View
- A virtue ethics guide to best practices for community-based participatory research
