Approved revisions
From The Embassy of Good Science
View list of: Pages whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved pages | All pages with an approved revision | Pages with invalid approvals | Files whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved files | All files with an approved revision | Files with invalid approvals
50 ss ordered by recently added
- AI Ethics and Governance in Practice: AI Fairness in Practice
- From Case Management to Prevention of Scientific Dishonesty in Denmark
- Framework to Enhance Research Integrity in Research Collaborations
- The Trust Code Supplement - A Global Code of Conduct for Research in Fragile Settings
- On Goffman: Ethnography and the Ethics of Care
- Population Health Data Implementation Guide (Deliverable 7.1)
- Research culture
- VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science Producers
- Recommendations of the Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK for Research Integrity Advisers and related background organisations1
- Fabrication and falsification
- The Nutty Professor
- Ethics unwrapped collection
- Simultaneous Submission Leading to Duplicate Publication
- Data Sharing in Ongoing Projects
- Deception by Research Participants
- Would You Do a Post Doc with this Guy?
- The Irreproducibility Crisis of Modern Science
- It’s Time to Get Serious About Research Fraud
- Scientific misconduct and science ethics: a case study based approach
- Training materials
- Head of research integrity initiative in China alleged of reseach misconduct
- Ethics defined: a glossary
- Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project
- Preprints. Instructions for Authors
- VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science Implementers
- Good-Practice Guide for Scientific-Academic Publishing (CSIC, Spain)
- The Ethics of Collecting Genetic Data From Indigenous People
- Irish National Forum on Research Integrity's Position Paper on Research Integrity & Research Ethics
- CAS Issues Open Access Policy (2014), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS)
- Gluten-free turkeys? Paper on dangers of wheat-based diet in birds retracted
- The RESPECT Code of Practice for Socioeconomic Research
- FDA Inspections Revealing Research Misconduct Hidden from Public View
- A virtue ethics guide to best practices for community-based participatory research
- One PhD student, a retraction, and an unconvincing rebuttal
- How trustworthy?
- Misconduct oversight at the DOE: Investigation closed
- Stanford University's Resources on Responsible and Ethical Conduct of Research
- Hungarian Academy of Sciences' Science Ethics Code
- WHO Policy on Open Access
- A case study on medical doctors using AI tools in diagnostics and treatment
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Instant Paper
- Code of Ethics for Scientific Research in Belgium (2009), Académie Royale des Sciences, des Lettres et des Beaux Arts de Belgique, the Académie Royale de Médecine de Belgique, the Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie van België voor Wetenschappen en Kunsten and the Koninklijke Academie voor Geneeskunde van België
- Giving Proper Credit
- Research misconduct
- HEIRRI courses
- Bothered and Bewildered But not Bewitched
- Reviewing the Ethics of Biobanking
- Challenges and Innovative Changes in Research Ethics Reviews (Policy brief), 2025
- The Ethics of Public Health Research on Less Expensive, Less Effective Interventions
- Alliance of German Science Organisations' Principles for the Handling of Research Data
