Approved revisions
From The Embassy of Good Science
View list of: Pages whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved pages | All pages with an approved revision | Pages with invalid approvals | Files whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved files | All files with an approved revision | Files with invalid approvals
50 ss ordered by recently added
- Boosting the Science Communication Ecosystem in Europe - full steam ahead. A policy report
- Misconduct? It's all academic
- Development of an institutional curriculum in ethics and public health
- Austrian Agency for Research Integrity Guidelines for Good Scientific Practice
- Retracted WHO Reports on Opioid Guidelines
- Educational approaches to the responsible conduct of clinical research: an exploratory study
- Reporting Full Findings
- The University of Oslo's Ethical guidelines for supervision relationships
- PREPARED Recommendations for Expediting Ethics Review during Times of Crisis
- International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Publication Recommendations
- European Federation of Psychologists' Associations (EFPA) Model-Code of Ethics
- Swiss Academy of Arts and Sciences Code of Conduct for Scientific Integrity r
- Springer Nature ‘continuing to investigate the concerns raised’ about paper linking obesity and lying
- Research Integrity and Conflicts of Interest: The Case of Unethical Research-Misconduct Charges
- Open Science – Policy and Guidance (Research Council of Norway)
- The TRUST Code: A Global Code of Conduct for Equitable Research Partnerships
- Linking Data Sets
- ENERI Manual Research Integrity and Ethics
- Netherlands Position Paper on the Recognition and Rewards of Academics
- Avoiding bias in qualitative data analysis
- Manchester University's Intellectual Property Policy
- Research integrity list at KU Leuven
- Emerging Infectious Diseases. Author Checklist
- Teaching Controversial Issues
- Office of Science and Technology Policy Memorandum on Open Access (2022), Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP)
- Declaración de la Alhambra sobre acceso abierto (2010), Fundación Española para la Ciencia y la Tecnología (FECYT) and Consortium of Southern European Libraries
- US Office of Research Integrity
- The university and the responsible conduct of research: who is responsible for what?
- Mentoring: failure
- On Being a Scientist: A Guide to Responsible Conduct in Research
- Imagine RRI. A card-based method for reflecting on responsibility in life science research
- Ethical Guidelines for Good Research Practice
- POIESIS Recommendations 7, 8, 9: Science Communication and Chains of Mediation
- Publication and data ownership
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Magazine Surprise
- Trustworthy, Reliable and Engaging Scientific Communication Approaches
- Respondent Confidentiality
- A Short Guide to the Digital Humanities
- HEADT Centre: An Introduction to Research Integrity
- Fake science: Who's to blame when the media gets research wrong?
- AI Ethics and Governance in Practice: AI Fairness in Practice
- From Case Management to Prevention of Scientific Dishonesty in Denmark
- Framework to Enhance Research Integrity in Research Collaborations
- The Trust Code Supplement - A Global Code of Conduct for Research in Fragile Settings
- On Goffman: Ethnography and the Ethics of Care
- Population Health Data Implementation Guide (Deliverable 7.1)
- Research culture
- VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science Producers
- Recommendations of the Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK for Research Integrity Advisers and related background organisations1
- Fabrication and falsification
