Why is this important? (Important Because)
From The Embassy of Good Science
A description to provide more focus to the theme/resource (max. 200 words)
- ⧼SA Foundation Data Type⧽: Text
F
Teaching students and researchers about rules and norms in research is one thing, but empowering them to deal with moral dilemmas in research practice is a challenge. Fictional narratives can be very useful in exploring the tough choices scientists have to make. +
Results from clinical trials are being used in daily clinical practice. Hence it is important that the results are correct and reliable. +
Finnish Guidance on the Responsible Conduct of Research and Procedures for Handling Allegations of Misconduct +
The Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity (TENK), which is appointed by the Ministry of Education and Culture in Finland (Decree 1347/1991), was established to promote the responsible conduct of research, to prevent research misconduct, to promote discussion and to spread information on research integrity in Finland and to monitor international developments in the field of research integrity. The Advisory Board makes proposals and issues statements concerning research integrity.'"`UNIQ--ref-0000001A-QINU`"'
'"`UNIQ--references-0000001B-QINU`"' +
As the authors of the guideline describe: "The ultimate responsibility for the quality of the dissertation rests with its author, but it is the supervisor´s duty to ensure that the doctoral student is familiar with the obligations and ethical practices related to a research process." (pg. 4)'"`UNIQ--ref-00000308-QINU`"'
'"`UNIQ--references-00000309-QINU`"' +
Good authorship practices are part and parcel of the responsible conduct of research. This means that all researchers should be aware of the important principles of authorship, such as who is eligible to be an author, taking responsibility for the content and preventing disputes. This document is therefore of practical value to all PhD students, researchers and supporters of research. +
Finnish TJNK Guideline on Bold Communication, Responsible Influence. Science Communication Recommendations +
Science and research are necessary for social advancement; thus, it is in society's interest to share research results with everyone in the community. While being bold and visible, it must also be explained in an understandable, unbiased and unexaggerated way. This guide provides information on how to strike the necessary balance and communicate successfully. +
This editorial provides information about possible consequences of research misconduct in various medical disciplines in the UK. +
Plagiarism is a scientific misconduct which consists in using others or one's owns previously published ideas without properly citing the original publication and author '"`UNIQ--ref-00000055-QINU`"'. Plagiarism can be easily avoided by using one's own words and by citing the original source when paraphrasing someone else's words or ideas. In spite of this, plagiarism remains an issue. This resource provides simple rules which support the process of proper referencing thereby helping in reducing the risk of plagiarism.
'"`UNIQ--references-00000056-QINU`"' +
The provided vignettes show the complexity of ethical issues in the field of speech and language research. +
This is important because it can make the difference in sharing important knowledge or not. +
The integrity of knowledge that emerges from research is based on individual and collective adherence to core values of objectivity, honesty, openness, fairness, accountability, and stewardship. Integrity in science means that the organizations in which research is conducted encourage those involved to exemplify these values in every step of the research process. Understanding the dynamics that support – or distort – practices that uphold the integrity of research by all participants ensures that the research enterprise advances knowledge. +
It shows that researchers who have been involved in fraudulent practices could have been involved in more controversies, and a full analysis of their publication record could reveal additional irregularities. +
Many issues of misconduct arise because collaborators have not agreed at the outset on the policies and practices to which the collaborative partners should adhere. +
Framework to Enhance Research Integrity in Research Collaborations (2022), National Research Integrity Forum +
Framework to Enhance Research Integrity in Research Collaborations distils national and international (ireland-funded research collabs) expectations for research integrity in Ireland and clarifies what researchers and institutions in International (research outside Ireland) need to do to comply. It reduces ambiguity, aligns local practice with international norms, and offers actionable steps that improve transparency, reproducibility, and equitable access. For policy leads, it is a benchmark; for authors and administrators, it is a practical checklist. Published by National Research Integrity Forum in 2022, it is a credible reference to cite in institutional policies, training, and grant documentation. +
Framework to Enhance Research Integrity in Research Collaborations (2022), National Research Integrity Forum +
Framework to Enhance Research Integrity in Research Collaborations distils national and international (ireland-funded research collabs) expectations for research integrity in Ireland and clarifies what researchers and institutions in International (research outside Ireland) need to do to comply. It reduces ambiguity, aligns local practice with international norms, and offers actionable steps that improve transparency, reproducibility, and equitable access. For policy leads, it is a benchmark; for authors and administrators, it is a practical checklist. Published by National Research Integrity Forum in 2022, it is a credible reference to cite in institutional policies, training, and grant documentation. +
Addressing harassment in research is especially important in fragile settings, where formal protections and oversight may be weak or absent. Researchers, participants, and local collaborators often face heightened risks due to power imbalances, cultural misunderstandings, and stressful working conditions. A clear anti-harassment framework ensures ethical conduct, protects vulnerable individuals, and promotes trust and safety within research teams and communities. It also supports the well-being and professional development of researchers, particularly women and early-career professionals. Prioritizing safety and respect strengthens both the quality and integrity of research outcomes. +
The ANR charter serves as the guiding document for everyone who carries out activities on behalf of ANR. Compliance to the duties and principles is required by ANR. +
'Conducting Ethical and Responsible Research – Guidelines' is important because it ensures credibility and trust in research by providing both preventive and corrective guidance. It prevents misconduct by educating researchers on standards, and offers frameworks for addressing violations fairly. In today’s interconnected research environment, having shared ethical codes strengthens international collaboration and consistency. For governments, institutions, and the public, this document demonstrates commitment to transparency, fairness, and societal responsibility. It is not just a guideline but a foundation for safeguarding the reliability of research outcomes. +
In the knowledge and innovation society marked by acceleration in the construction and transmission of knowledge and by international competitiveness, public higher education and research institutions and universities are in a privileged position to address current and future challenges. They are responsible for the production, transmission and utilization of knowledge and contribute to the implementation of a qualified expertise in public decision making processes. However, the application of this major responsibility implies consolidating trust relationship between research and society.'"`UNIQ--ref-00000002-QINU`"'
'"`UNIQ--references-00000003-QINU`"' +
This case highlights the importance of involving diverse actors in misconduct investigations. The article explains that it was considered important to represent a broad spectrum of health sciences on the committee because decisions on honesty/dishonesty due to their inherently inexact and judgmental nature must reflect the general culture of the research environment.'"`UNIQ--ref-000000D9-QINU`"'
'"`UNIQ--references-000000DA-QINU`"' +
