LoginSign up

Approved revisions

From The Embassy of Good Science

View list of: Pages whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved pages | All pages with an approved revision | Pages with invalid approvals | Files whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved files | All files with an approved revision | Files with invalid approvals

50 ss ordered by recently added

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
  1. Finnish Guidance on the Responsible Conduct of Research and Procedures for Handling Allegations of Misconduct
  2. Transparify: A tool for transparent reporting of funding sources
  3. 'I am really sorry': Peer Reviewer Stole Text for Own Paper
  4. Forbidden Knowledge
  5. Tri-Agency Open Access Policy on Publications (2015) , Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC)
  6. The Norwegian General guidelines for Research Ethics 2019
  7. Practical tools and strategies for researchers to increase replicability
  8. ENAI glossary
  9. Postdoc randomly chose data during figure assembly
  10. Declaración de Panamá sobre Ciencia Abierta (2018), Co-created by university and civil society members from Latin America and the Caribbean
  11. Teaching ethics in nursing curricula. Traditional and contemporary models.
  12. The importance of formative assessment in science and engineering ethics education: some evidence and practical advice
  13. Committee On Publication Ethics (COPE) Guidelines
  14. University of Oslo's Ethical Guidelines
  15. Indian Academy of Sciences Scientific values: Ethical guidelines and procedures (2024)
  16. Mentoring: disabilities
  17. Baltimore Case - In Brief
  18. The Culture of Scientific Research in the UK
  19. A proposal for a model of informed consent for the collection, storage and use of biological materials for research purposes
  20. Irish National Policy Statement on Ensuring Research Integrity
  21. Putting citizens at the centre of research and innovation- Policy brief
  22. European Network of Research Integrity Offices Recommendations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct
  23. Montreal Statement on Research Integrity in Cross-Boundary Research Collaborations (2013), WCRI
  24. Strategies for making research more accessible to dental students
  25. The ETHNA System. A Guide to the Ethical Governance of RRI in Innovation and Research in Research Performing Organisations and Research Funding Organisations.
  26. Societal Trust in Science, Research and Innovation (RPOs)- Policy brief
  27. Can a scientific paper be published anonymously?
  28. Safeguards, Data-sharing and the Disclosure of Sensitive Results: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project
  29. The Nuremberg Code
  30. Obstructive sleep apnoea
  31. Show Me The Money!
  32. German Council of Science and Humanities' Recommendations for Evaluating and Controlling Research Performance
  33. The Art and Politics of Covert Research: Doing ‘Situated Ethics’ in the Field
  34. A scoping review of competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals.
  35. Research Integrity - Detecting and determining greyscales
  36. Psychologist made up sex bias results
  37. Irish National Forum on Research Integrity's Report on Fostering a Climate of Excellence for Irish Research
  38. Gauging the potential societal contributions of research and innovation – a guide for HEFRCs
  39. RRI tools collection of resources
  40. Hazardous materials
  41. Infographic - SOPs4RI Research integrity education guidelines for research institutions
  42. Position statement of the UKRIO: Statutory regulation of research integrity
  43. 10 Things for Curating Reproducible and FAIR Research
  44. WIFO AI Guidelines on the Proper Use of Generative Models of Artificial Intelligence
  45. Robbers, Rogues or Revolutionaries: Handling Armed Intimidation
  46. Resource:Eda2fa99-60f2-4816-adda-4ba704f20cfb
  47. Good Epidemiological Practice Guidelines
  48. Framework to Enhance Research Integrity in Research Collaborations
  49. Research Integrity: Sabotage!
  50. Unwritten expectations in doctoral training: research integrity scenario
View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Retrieved from "https://embassy.science:443/wiki/Special:ApprovedRevs"
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
More information

Your platform for research integrity and ethics

Privacy statementTerms of serviceTake down policyContact
Let us keep you posted

Bluesky Logo.svg

The EnTIRE and VIRT2UE projects have received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research programme under grant agreements N 741782 and N 787580.

5.3.4