Approved revisions
From The Embassy of Good Science
View list of: Pages whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved pages | All pages with an approved revision | Pages with invalid approvals | Files whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved files | All files with an approved revision | Files with invalid approvals
50 ss ordered by recently added
- Conflicts of Interest in Research on Antipsychotic Treatment
- Innovation under pressure: Implications for data privacy during the Covid-19 pandemic
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Data Fabrication
- Mapping stakeholders and scoping involvement – a guide for HEFRCs
- Disclosing Conflicts of Interest in Scientific Advice
- A bullshit excuse? My lab notebook “was blown into a manure pit”
- Access to Scientific Information (by the Inter-Academy Panel) (2013), InterAcademy Panel
- National Guidelines for Promoting Open Science (2024), National Library of Sweden (Kungliga biblioteket, KB)
- European Molecular Biology Organization Resources to Foster Research Integrity
- Research misconduct and the INTERGROWTH-21st study
- FAIR-Aware: Your first step towards your FAIR data(set).
- The REAPPRAISED checklist to identify flawed papers
- Encouraging accountability in research: a pilot assessment of training efforts
- KU Leuven - Supervisor tips to promote research integrity
- Chinese Code of Conduct for Responsible Research, 2023
- Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (2020), the Royal Irish Academy
- Position Paper on Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) in Austria
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Disputes in Authorship (1)
- "Why should I acknowledge writing assistance if I have paid for it?" A case study
- Humanities in the European Research Area (HERA)
- Ethics Requirement Score: new tool for evaluating ethics in publications
- Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003)
- Clinical Trials and Drug Promotion: Selective Reporting of Study 329
- One in six of the papers you cite in a review has been retracted. What do you do?
- Evaluating teaching and students' learning of academic research ethic
- Path2Integrity Learning Cards
- Cochrane library
- Reporting censurable conditions for employees at University of Oslo (whistleblowing)
- Science Council of Japan on Code of Conduct for Scientists–Revised Version (2013)
- Research Integrity Practices in Science Europe Member Organizations
- Studying Vulnerable Individuals
- XR and General Purpose AI: from values and principles to norms and standards (policy brief)
- How I Was Nearly Duped into 'Authoring' a Fake Paper
- Administrators and Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR)
- Authorship: video
- ENERI Classroom
- Effectiveness of a responsible conduct of research course: a preliminary study
- Publishing complications and patient safety
- Successful and timely uptake of artificial intelligence in science in the EU
- European Commission Guidance on Research on Refugees, Asylum Seekers & Migrants
- Research or Services?
- U.S. Gov’t Physicist Sentenced to 18 months in Prison for Fraud
- cOAlition S Accelerating the transition to full and immediate Open Access to scientific publications
- Manchester University's Data Management Planning Guidance
- EU-Life Training
- BEYOND Guidelines for Preventing and Addressing Research Misconduct
- VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science Oversight and Protection Actors
- Portuguese National Council of Ethics for the Life Sciences Recommendation on Integrity in Scientific Research
- Romanian Codul General de Etică în Cercetarea Științifică - General code of ethics in scientific research 2015
- Definition of plagiarism: Phrasing
