Why is this important? (Important Because)
From The Embassy of Good Science
A description to provide more focus to the theme/resource (max. 200 words)
- ⧼SA Foundation Data Type⧽: Text
F
Good authorship practices are part and parcel of the responsible conduct of research. This means that all researchers should be aware of the important principles of authorship, such as who is eligible to be an author, taking responsibility for the content and preventing disputes. This document is therefore of practical value to all PhD students, researchers and supporters of research. +
Finnish TJNK Guideline on Bold Communication, Responsible Influence. Science Communication Recommendations +
Science and research are necessary for social advancement; thus, it is in society's interest to share research results with everyone in the community. While being bold and visible, it must also be explained in an understandable, unbiased and unexaggerated way. This guide provides information on how to strike the necessary balance and communicate successfully. +
This editorial provides information about possible consequences of research misconduct in various medical disciplines in the UK. +
Plagiarism is a scientific misconduct which consists in using others or one's owns previously published ideas without properly citing the original publication and author '"`UNIQ--ref-00000055-QINU`"'. Plagiarism can be easily avoided by using one's own words and by citing the original source when paraphrasing someone else's words or ideas. In spite of this, plagiarism remains an issue. This resource provides simple rules which support the process of proper referencing thereby helping in reducing the risk of plagiarism.
'"`UNIQ--references-00000056-QINU`"' +
The provided vignettes show the complexity of ethical issues in the field of speech and language research. +
This is important because it can make the difference in sharing important knowledge or not. +
The integrity of knowledge that emerges from research is based on individual and collective adherence to core values of objectivity, honesty, openness, fairness, accountability, and stewardship. Integrity in science means that the organizations in which research is conducted encourage those involved to exemplify these values in every step of the research process. Understanding the dynamics that support – or distort – practices that uphold the integrity of research by all participants ensures that the research enterprise advances knowledge. +
It shows that researchers who have been involved in fraudulent practices could have been involved in more controversies, and a full analysis of their publication record could reveal additional irregularities. +
This framework matters to researchers in collaborative projects, as it helps clarify shared expectations and responsibilities from the outset. Research institutions and universities benefit by using it to build robust governance and avoid conflicts or misconduct across partners. It is useful for project leaders and administrators responsible for project agreements, ethical oversight, and reporting mechanisms. Funding agencies and research integrity officers can reference it to ensure compliance with best practices and responsible conduct requirements. Finally, it supports journal editors and research evaluators by reinforcing integrity standards that underpin credible, transparent collaborative research outputs. +
Many issues of misconduct arise because collaborators have not agreed at the outset on the policies and practices to which the collaborative partners should adhere. +
Framework to Enhance Research Integrity in Research Collaborations (2022), National Research Integrity Forum +
Framework to Enhance Research Integrity in Research Collaborations distils national and international (ireland-funded research collabs) expectations for research integrity in Ireland and clarifies what researchers and institutions in International (research outside Ireland) need to do to comply. It reduces ambiguity, aligns local practice with international norms, and offers actionable steps that improve transparency, reproducibility, and equitable access. For policy leads, it is a benchmark; for authors and administrators, it is a practical checklist. Published by National Research Integrity Forum in 2022, it is a credible reference to cite in institutional policies, training, and grant documentation. +
Framework to Enhance Research Integrity in Research Collaborations (2022), National Research Integrity Forum +
Framework to Enhance Research Integrity in Research Collaborations distils national and international (ireland-funded research collabs) expectations for research integrity in Ireland and clarifies what researchers and institutions in International (research outside Ireland) need to do to comply. It reduces ambiguity, aligns local practice with international norms, and offers actionable steps that improve transparency, reproducibility, and equitable access. For policy leads, it is a benchmark; for authors and administrators, it is a practical checklist. Published by National Research Integrity Forum in 2022, it is a credible reference to cite in institutional policies, training, and grant documentation. +
Addressing harassment in research is especially important in fragile settings, where formal protections and oversight may be weak or absent. Researchers, participants, and local collaborators often face heightened risks due to power imbalances, cultural misunderstandings, and stressful working conditions. A clear anti-harassment framework ensures ethical conduct, protects vulnerable individuals, and promotes trust and safety within research teams and communities. It also supports the well-being and professional development of researchers, particularly women and early-career professionals. Prioritizing safety and respect strengthens both the quality and integrity of research outcomes. +
The ANR charter serves as the guiding document for everyone who carries out activities on behalf of ANR. Compliance to the duties and principles is required by ANR. +
'Conducting Ethical and Responsible Research – Guidelines' is important because it ensures credibility and trust in research by providing both preventive and corrective guidance. It prevents misconduct by educating researchers on standards, and offers frameworks for addressing violations fairly. In today’s interconnected research environment, having shared ethical codes strengthens international collaboration and consistency. For governments, institutions, and the public, this document demonstrates commitment to transparency, fairness, and societal responsibility. It is not just a guideline but a foundation for safeguarding the reliability of research outcomes. +
In the knowledge and innovation society marked by acceleration in the construction and transmission of knowledge and by international competitiveness, public higher education and research institutions and universities are in a privileged position to address current and future challenges. They are responsible for the production, transmission and utilization of knowledge and contribute to the implementation of a qualified expertise in public decision making processes. However, the application of this major responsibility implies consolidating trust relationship between research and society.'"`UNIQ--ref-00000002-QINU`"'
'"`UNIQ--references-00000003-QINU`"' +
This case highlights the importance of involving diverse actors in misconduct investigations. The article explains that it was considered important to represent a broad spectrum of health sciences on the committee because decisions on honesty/dishonesty due to their inherently inexact and judgmental nature must reflect the general culture of the research environment.'"`UNIQ--ref-000000D9-QINU`"'
'"`UNIQ--references-000000DA-QINU`"' +
Financial support for research is often obtained from intramural (e.g. from university funds) or extramural (e.g. from funding agencies) sources. Funders have some responsibility for ensuring that the research they fund is conducted in accordance with relevant laws and good research practices. However, funders’ oversight and reporting standards differ greatly.
Collaborations, particularly those related to funding, also have the potential to influence the ways in which research questions are defined and the results presented. A particular concern involves collaborations between academia and industry-sponsors. Studies have shown that industry-sponsored research tends to favor the sponsor.'"`UNIQ--ref-000001B9-QINU`"' Therefore, funders need to be transparant about their aims, researchers should declare the source of funding, academic autonomy must be ensured, and researchers must be aware that funders can potentially influence research.
'"`UNIQ--references-000001BA-QINU`"' +
G
GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCH INTEGRITY (2019), CNR Research Ethics and Integrity Committee - (64 RI GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCH INTEGRITY - Italy, p. 1) +
GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCH INTEGRITY distils national expectations for research integrity in Italy and clarifies what researchers and institutions in nan need to do to comply. It reduces ambiguity, aligns local practice with international norms, and offers actionable steps that improve transparency, reproducibility, and equitable access. For policy leads, it is a benchmark; for authors and administrators, it is a practical checklist. Published by CNR Research Ethics and Integrity Committee - (64 RI GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCH INTEGRITY - Italy, p. 1) in 2019, it is a credible reference to cite in institutional policies, training, and grant documentation. +
Gene editing technologies are revolutionizing science. They offer potential cures for genetic diseases and improvements in food security. However, concerns over ethical boundaries, human enhancement, ecological impact, and long-term consequences highlight the need for responsible research. Cases like gene-edited babies illustrate the risks of unethical practices. Researchers must be aware of these challenges to prevent harm, ensure transparency, and foster public trust in scientific advancements. +
