Why is this important? (Important Because)
From The Embassy of Good Science
A description to provide more focus to the theme/resource (max. 200 words)
- ⧼SA Foundation Data Type⧽: Text
L
This resource is helpful for researchers interested in knowing their legal liability, the range of actors who may pursue legal action against them, and specific areas of practice where they may face lawsuits. It may also be helpful for researchers' legal representation as a way to begin familiarizing themselves with case law.'"`UNIQ--references-00000001-QINU`"' +
This compilation is important because it strengthens the '''competence, consistency, and professionalism''' of Research Ethics Committees (RECs). High-quality ethical review is essential to protect research participants, ensure scientific integrity, and uphold public trust. By providing accessible and structured online training options, the document helps both new and experienced REC members build knowledge on ethical principles, regulations, and practical decision-making. It also supports harmonisation across institutions and countries, reducing variability in ethics review processes. Ultimately, these resources enable RECs to make better-informed evaluations, address emerging ethical challenges, and contribute to responsible, transparent, and ethically sound research practices. +
This compilation is important because it provides RIOs with reliable, accessible, and practical tools to strengthen their capacity to support integrity across the research process. High-quality training helps research integrity officers make informed decisions, handle allegations consistently, and advise researchers effectively. With growing expectations for transparency, accountability, and responsible research conduct, institutions need well-trained integrity professionals who can manage complex cases and promote a culture of good practice. By gathering diverse, vetted training options in one place, the document reduces institutional barriers, promotes harmonisation across Europe, and supports the development of robust research integrity systems. +
Code of Ethics for Researchers' is important because it ensures credibility and trust in research by providing both preventive and corrective guidance. It prevents misconduct by educating researchers on standards, and offers frameworks for addressing violations fairly. In today’s interconnected research environment, having shared ethical codes strengthens international collaboration and consistency. For governments, institutions, and the public, this document demonstrates commitment to transparency, fairness, and societal responsibility. It is not just a guideline but a foundation for safeguarding the reliability of research outcomes. +
In addition to the law of 2009, this legislation aims to improve the quality of education and research and to promote innovation through various means, such as establishing integrated centers for business and science, creating a center for quality assessment in education and research, appointing ombudspersons for academic ethics and evaluating higher educational institutions. +
PhD students learn how to do research from principal investigators (PIs). However, science often progresses very rapidly, and not all PIs are always aware of the most recent developments and new perspectives. To remedy this problem, the course provides early career researchers with tools for self-learning that help them to navigate competently and confidently through scientific fields characterized by rapid progress and change. +
Cross-boundary collaboration (between disciplines, countries, institutions) is becoming more common to address scientific problems and societal challenges that are difficult to answer from one discipline or setting. It is important to understand the types of problems that can arise during such collaborations. +
M
This LMS is important because it provides '''accessible, structured training''' on key aspects of ethical and regulatory practice in health research, aligned with the '''MRC’s expectations'''. High-quality e-learning helps researchers and staff understand ethical principles, legal requirements, and good research standards, improving compliance and research quality. The availability of assessments and certificates also supports professional development and institutional training programmes. Especially for those involved in clinical or data-intensive research, this centralised platform enhances understanding of complex topics like confidentiality, data protection, and human tissue legislation, helping reduce errors and ensure ethical conduct. +
The case shows the extent of adverse consequences for researchers, patients and research institutes when proper ethical guidelines and practices are not followed. +
Presented by the American Sociological Association, this is an interesting case for research and academic professionals in every field. It poses some thought provoking questions as to one’s ethical obligations towards fulfilling the roles that come with one’s post.
It also gives a glimpse of how competing responsibilities may allow a fall in performance and how academic institutions and their employees can work together towards coming to mutual understanding and agreement on how to promote high standards and improvement. +
This is an interesting case for several reasons. Firstly, it shows that allegations of misconduct are not restricted to individual researchers and their institutions but also to journal editors and publishers;although such cases have so far been less frequently encountered, they are now becoming increasingly common.
Secondly, the specific allegations may appear more difficult to investigate and/or prove as misconduct. One of these two journals, in this specific case, maintain that there was no intention to inflate the impact factor and any excessive self-citation was due to a 'niche' area where no many other journals publish on the topic.
The case is also interesting and can stimulate discussions as to what is a good balance between broad and specialized referencing. +
Besides national research integrity guidelines, University-level guidelines are also crucial in ensuring good research practices. To help staff and students adhere to these practices, this guideline enumerates the principles of good research and what constitutes research misconduct. +
The DMP is created in the planning phase of a research project, and outlines how the (prospective) researcher will create, maintain, protect and store data in an ethical and secure manner, both during and after the project. Thus, it is important to be aware of the standards for good data management. The University also provides links to data management support staff who could optimize researchers' DMPs. +
Since the institution handles large amounts of data on a routine basis, it is important for staff and students to be aware of data protection principles and laws. To ensure compliance to national and international standards, the Manchester University provides detailed guidance to its members who handle personal data. +
The creation of Intellectual Property entails important legal procedures that pertain to ownership, property rights, revenue generation and sharing and dissemination of scholarly work. This guideline details these legal and ethical aspects, as well as provides information on the supporting offices and infrastructure at the university. +
As also described in the article, the incidence of scientific misconduct seems to be increasing.'"`UNIQ--ref-00000002-QINU`"' However, not all scientific misconduct is deliberate, but may also result from insufficient training or a lack of knowledge. The overview and recommendations described in this article may aid in the prevention of such accidental scientific misconduct. Moreover, this resource can also help to uncover more intentional forms of scientific misconduct. It is noted in the article that many cases of scientific misconduct are reported by the thoughtful readers of scientific articles. This article may assist readers and other members of the scientific community in the recognition of the various forms of scientific misconduct. Hopefully, it also convinces them of the importance of reporting these cases. +
Adhering to ethical standards is fundamental to ensure a successful outcome for the medical technology industry, the safe and effective use of medical technology, and the advancement of medical technologies. Besides, this code is endorsed by the Biomedical Alliance in Europe in their Code of Conduct. +
Medical curriculum prepares medical students for their future profession by teaching them the facts and rules of medicine as well as other aspects of medical profession, such as professional behavior and ethics. +
Robert Merton developed his norms as a way to describe what constitutes the ethos of modern science. Since then, research has shown that various practice-based problems still occur, such as research misconduct, falsification, fabrication, plagiarism and questionable research practices. Scientists are still aiming for improvement, and Mertonian norms are still very much relevant. +
Meta-Analysis Map: relevant factors shaping public attitudes of science communication - policy brief +
This meta-analysis is important because it clarifies ''why'' people interpret and trust (or reject) scientific information the way they do. By systematically mapping research on psychological, communicative, and media-related factors, it provides a structured evidence base that helps countries, organisations, and communicators design more effective science communication strategies. Understanding these factors is crucial for confronting misinformation and enhancing public engagement with science especially in areas with high societal impact like health, climate change, and digital innovation. The report also sets the groundwork for subsequent empirical studies and practical tools developed in the wider TRESCA project. Its insights can guide communicators and policymakers in tailoring messages that resonate with audiences and build trust in reliable scientific knowledge. +
