LoginSign up

Approved revisions

From The Embassy of Good Science

View list of: Pages whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved pages | All pages with an approved revision | Pages with invalid approvals | Files whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved files | All files with an approved revision | Files with invalid approvals

50 ss ordered by recently added

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
  1. Insufficiently reported study flaws and limitations
  2. Faking it in academia- the rise of authorship fraud
  3. Prospective registration of clinical trials
  4. Fabrication
  5. The impact of the GDPR on scientific data
  6. The Rise of Octopus Affiliation: Navigating Multiple Institutional Associations in Academic Publishing
  7. Dialogue versus debate
  8. Initiatives promoting research integrity
  9. Dutch National Survey on Research Integrity
  10. Collaboration In Research
  11. Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity
  12. Monitoring funding processes
  13. Data management plans
  14. The learning curve - theatre play #MeTooAcademia
  15. P-value hacking
  16. Conflict of interests
  17. The influence of pharmaceutical company on drug availability
  18. Science policy
  19. Consent and Assent for Research on Children
  20. Poor mentoring or supervision of early career researcherers
  21. Networks and projects promoting research integrity
  22. Sponsorship of drug and device studies by the manufacturing company
  23. Collaborative working
  24. Superb Supervision: integrity training for supervisors
  25. H-index
  26. (re)submitting without consent of all authors
  27. Not acknowledging contributors who do not qualify for authorship
  28. Communicate results to the general public before a peer reviewed publication is available
  29. Journal Impact Factor
  30. Outcome reporting bias
  31. Replicability
  32. Research with children
  33. Spin of research results
  34. Ethical issues of involving children with disabilities in research
  35. Standards of authorship
  36. Research metrics
  37. Research integrity training for diverse disciplines
  38. Questionable Research Practices in Collaboration
  39. High income and low- and middle-income country collaborations
  40. Questionable research practices & research misbehaviors
  41. Improper data use (a bias distorting research results)
  42. Affiliations
  43. Responsible mentoring
  44. Being grossly unfair to your collaborators
  45. Research Integrity Advisors
  46. Post-publication peer review
  47. Take no full responsibility for the integrity of the research project and its reports
  48. Funders
  49. Salami publication
  50. Plan S
View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Retrieved from "https://embassy.science:443/wiki/Special:ApprovedRevs"
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
More information

Your platform for research integrity and ethics

Privacy statementTerms of serviceTake down policyContact
Let us keep you posted

Bluesky Logo.svg

The EnTIRE and VIRT2UE projects have received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research programme under grant agreements N 741782 and N 787580.

5.3.4