Why is this important? (Important Because)

A description to provide more focus to the theme/resource (max. 200 words)

⧼SA Foundation Data Type⧽: Text

Usage

Filter<p>The <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" class="external text" href="https://www.semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Property_page/Filter">search filter</a> allows the inclusion of <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" class="external text" href="https://www.semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Query_expressions">query expressions</a> such as <code>~</code> or <code>!</code>. The selected <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" class="external text" href="https://www.semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Query_engine">query engine</a> might also support case insensitive matching or other short expressions like:</p><ul><li><code>in:</code> result should include the term, e.g. '<code>in:Foo</code>'</li></ul><ul><li><code>not:</code> result should to not include the term, e.g. '<code>not:Bar</code>'</li></ul>

Showing 5 pages using this property.

Ö

Öz beyan yaklaşımı, araştırmada iyiliğin farklı şekilleri üzerine fikir yürütme +

Araştırma doğruluğu çalışması, araştırmada iyiliğin ne anlama geldiği bilinmezse kolaylıkla ezbere dayalı bir süreç haline gelebilir. Bu alıştırma, “iyi araştırma”dan kastımızın ne olduğu üzerine düşünmeye yardımcı olmayı amaçlamaktadır. +

Öz beyan yaklaşımı, araştırmada iyiliğin farklı şekilleri üzerine fikir yürütme +

Araştırma doğruluğu çalışması, araştırmada iyiliğin ne anlama geldiği bilinmezse kolaylıkla ezbere dayalı bir süreç haline gelebilir. İyiliğin ve iyi bir araştırmanın ne olduğunu bilmek, araştırma doğruluğu çalışmaları için iyi bir temel oluşturur. Bu konu üzerine fikir yürütürken araştırma doğruluğunu savunma nedenimiz üzerine odaklanmış oluruz. +

‘

‘Caught in the act’: Veterinary researcher caught fabricating gene data, resigns from university job +

There are fewer examples of fabrication of data or results in veterinary research;this case is one of such examples. +

“

“There can be no justification for such studies”: Paper on artificial eyes for dogs earns expression of concern +

There is an expression of concern rather than a retraction to this study. Whilst questions were raised whether the study met the internationally accepted standards of animal research ethics, Retraction Watch informs us that PLOS ONE noted that the experiment was approved by the relevant ethics approval body. However, it is important to present this case since - as the title suggests - not everyone would agree with the justification of such studies and practices. +

负

负责任研究行为规范指引 - Code of Conduct for Responsible Research (2023), Department of Supervision, Ministry of Science and Technology (70. Chat GPT - China - Code of Conduct for Responsible Research, Pos. 3) +

负责任研究行为规范指引 - Code of Conduct for Responsible Research distils national expectations for research integrity in China and clarifies what researchers and institutions in China need to do to comply. It reduces ambiguity, aligns local practice with international norms, and offers actionable steps that improve transparency, reproducibility, and equitable access. For policy leads, it is a benchmark;for authors and administrators, it is a practical checklist. Published by Department of Supervision, Ministry of Science and Technology (70. Chat GPT - China - Code of Conduct for Responsible Research, Pos. 3) in 2023, it is a credible reference to cite in institutional policies, training, and grant documentation. +