Scientific misconduct at an elite medical institute: The role of competing institutional logics and fragmented control

What is this about?

This paper builds on the concepts of competing logics and institutional fields to analyze a serious case of medical and scientific misconduct at a leading research institute, Karolinska in Sweden, home to the Nobel Prize in Medicine^[1].

↑ https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048733318300817?via%3Dihub

Why is this important?

The incidence of revealed fraud and dishonesty in academia is on the rise, and so is the number of studies seeking to explain scientific misconduct^[1].

Journal

Factual

↑ https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048733318300817?via%3Dihub

For whom is this important?

researchersresearch leadersAll stakeholders in researchphd students

Other information

Virtues & Values

Good Practices & Misconduct

Research Area

Clinical medicine

[1] ttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048733318300817?via%3Dihub

[2] ttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048733318300817?via%3Dihub

[1]

[1]

Scientific misconduct at an elite medical institute: The role of competing institutional logics and fragmented control

Scientific misconduct at an elite medical institute: The role of competing institutional logics and fragmented control

What is this about?

Why is this important?

For whom is this important?

Other information

Who

When

Where

Virtues & Values

Good Practices & Misconduct

Research Area