Limitations are not properly acknowledged in the scientific literature

From The Embassy of Good Science
Revision as of 11:08, 22 October 2020 by 0000-0003-3048-2023 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Cases |Title=Limitations are not properly acknowledged in the scientific literature |Is About=This study discussed how only 17% of 400 articles publi...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Cases

Limitations are not properly acknowledged in the scientific literature

What is this about?

This study discussed how only 17% of 400 articles published in 2005 in journals with the highest number of citations used words 'limitation', 'caveat' or 'caution' in their texts, only 1% of articles used the word 'limitation' in their abstracts, whereas not one article mentioned limitations of their research that had impact on their conclusions.

For whom is this important?

Other information

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6