“There can be no justification for such studies”: Paper on artificial eyes for dogs earns expression of concern
From The Embassy of Good Science
Revision as of 14:32, 21 June 2021 by 0000-0002-1723-7560 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Cases |Title=“There can be no justification for such studies”: Paper on artificial eyes for dogs earns expression of concern |Is About=This is th...")
ResourcesCases
“There can be no justification for such studies”: Paper on artificial eyes for dogs earns expression of concern
What is this about?
This is the factual case of research where 3-D artificial eyes for dogs were created in order to 'improve' the dogs' appearance.
Why is this important?
There is an expression of concern rather than a retraction to this study. Whilst questions were raised whether the study met the internationally accepted standards of animal research ethics, Retraction Watch informs us that PLOS ONE noted that the experiment was approved by the relevant ethics approval body. However, it is important to present this case since - as the title suggests - not everyone would agree with the justification of such studies and practices.
