Suborning science for profit: Monsanto, glyphosate, and private science research misconduct

From The Embassy of Good Science
Revision as of 15:52, 2 December 2021 by 0000-0002-6817-5697 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Cases |Title=Suborning science for profit: Monsanto, glyphosate, and private science research misconduct |Is About=Monsanto engaged in ghostwriting a...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Cases

Suborning science for profit: Monsanto, glyphosate, and private science research misconduct

What is this about?

Monsanto engaged in ghostwriting and other types of research misconduct to disrupt regulatory oversight of one of its most profitable products. Although public-science organizations have sanctions in place to punish research misconduct, private-science organizations do not. At least one Monsanto employee boasted about research misconduct in promotion materials. Journal editors who oversaw decisions in which Monsanto manipulated the peer review process did not disclose their conflicts of interest. Scientific misconduct by private firms threatens the integrity of public science and the public's trust in science.

For whom is this important?

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6