Philosophical Justifications for Human Subjects Research
From The Embassy of Good Science
Revision as of 18:06, 15 February 2024 by 0009-0001-9914-1502 (talk | contribs)
InstructionsPhilosophical Justifications for Human Subjects Research
Instructions for:TraineeTrainer
Goal
The objectives of this section are:
- Knowing main theories on philosophical justification of human subjects research
- Being able to argue whether and under what conditions the well-being of research participants must always take precedence over scientific interests
- Knowing how to evaluate Tuskegee from an historical perspective
- Knowing some historical scandals and cases which have led to the practice of ethically reflecting on human subjects research
- Evaluating the moral aspects of Tuskegee
Duration (hours)
2
For whom is this important?
What is this about?
In human subjects research people are used primarily to benefit others. Hence use of human beings needs justification. In the presentation included below, you will hear two perspectives on enrolling human beings for medical purposes.
Some scholars believe it is justified as long as researchers and sponsors avoid exploitation, others argue that people can be used for research purposes as long as their human dignity is respected, meaning that they are not used merely as a means.1
Introduction: Philosophical Justifications
As an introduction to the topic of Ethics in Human Subjects Research, please view the presentation below.
The presentation covers:
- The major ethical considerations in Human Subjects research.
- Exploitation.
- Being used merely as means.
Steps
