Difference between revisions of "Instruction:6b129846-c455-4849-9eaf-0d25f3c5600e"
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
{{Instruction Perspective Trainee}} | {{Instruction Perspective Trainee}} | ||
{{Instruction Step Trainee | {{Instruction Step Trainee | ||
| − | |Instruction Step Title=1. State problem. | + | |Instruction Step Title=1. State problem. |
|Instruction Step Text=For example, “there’s something about this decision that makes me uncomfortable” or “do I have a conflict of interest?” | |Instruction Step Text=For example, “there’s something about this decision that makes me uncomfortable” or “do I have a conflict of interest?” | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
{{Custom TabContent Close Trainer}} | {{Custom TabContent Close Trainer}} | ||
{{Related To | {{Related To | ||
| − | |Related To Instruction=Instruction:6cc77174-4f7b-48a6-95f3-eeb4dadcb0a3 | + | |Related To Instruction=Instruction:A440eed0-f9f4-4415-a2c4-2d6ff9f44b80;Instruction:6b129846-c455-4849-9eaf-0d25f3c5600e;Instruction:41bc2a1d-26f7-49f9-8bf7-9fc6b4ecf10c;Instruction:C0cf8cfb-6090-49e3-94f5-20f530f83ffd;Instruction:6cc77174-4f7b-48a6-95f3-eeb4dadcb0a3;Instruction:Ffff98bc-b81b-43ee-8fef-a264c1e25741 |
}} | }} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
Revision as of 15:49, 8 June 2021
Instructions02 - The Seven Step Method: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity
1. State problem.
For example, “there’s something about this decision that makes me uncomfortable” or “do I have a conflict of interest?”
2. Check facts
Many problems disappear upon closer examination of the situation, while others change radically.
3. Identify relevant factors
For example, persons involved, laws, professional codes, and other practical constraints.
4. Develop a list of options
Be imaginative, try to avoid “dilemma”; not “yes” or “no” but whom to go to, what to say.
5. Test options
1. Employ one or more of the following tests:
· Harm test: does this option do less harm than alternatives?
· Publicity test: would I want my decision published in the newspaper?
· Defensibility test: could I defend my choice before a committee?
· Reversibility test: would I still make my choice if I were adversely affected by it?
· Colleague test: what are my colleagues’ responses to the options?
· Professional test: what might my profession’s governing body or ethics committee say about my choice?
· Organization test: what does the company’s ethics officer or legal counsel say about my choice?6. Make a choice
All things considered, make a choice.
7. Review steps 1–6.
· Are there any precautions you can take?
· Is there any way to access more support next time?
· Is there any way to change the organization (for example, suggest policy changes at next departmental meeting)?
