A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Multiple Submissions (2)
From The Embassy of Good Science
Revision as of 17:29, 8 March 2021 by 0000-0001-8342-1051 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Cases |Title=A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Multiple Submissions (2) |Is About=A researcher submitted a manuscript to a journal. After a couple...")
ResourcesCases
A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Multiple Submissions (2)
What is this about?
A researcher submitted a manuscript to a journal. After a couple of months of not hearing from the editorial board, they re-submitted the manuscript to another journal. A day after re-submission, they received an email from the first journal that their article was going to be accepted after minor revisions. They withdrew the re-submission from the second journal.
For whom is this important?
What are the best practices?
On submission of an article, authors are usually asked to mention whether their submission is under review elsewhere. Duplicate submission is a form of research misconduct. However, if a journal does not review a manuscript in an appropriate amount of time, authors can withdraw their manuscript. However, the editor-in-chief should be informed beforehand and a record of all correspondence maintained by the corresponding author. Authors should never submit a manuscript to another journal before appropriate withdrawal of the manuscript or notice of a rejection.
