Difference between revisions of "Resource:15de5331-8dc3-4dba-8b81-5abcb412e698"

From The Embassy of Good Science
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Title=The Aftermath of Scientific Fraud
 
|Title=The Aftermath of Scientific Fraud
|Is About=Scientific fraud became front-page news at the end of last year, when South Korean stem cell researcher, Woo Suk Hwang, admitted to fabricating data about cloned human embryonic stem cell lines that he claimed were created from patients. Much of the press coverage focused on the fallout of Hwang's actions on the public's trust in science and the already fragile image of stem cell research<ref>https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(06)00249-2?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS0092867406002492%3Fshowall%3Dtrue</ref>.
+
|Is About=Scientific fraud became front-page news at the end of last year, when a South Korean stem cell researcher admitted to fabricating data about cloned human embryonic stem cell lines that he claimed were created from patients. Much of the press coverage focused on the fallout of his actions on the public's trust in science and the already fragile image of stem cell research<ref>Bonetta, Laura. "The aftermath of scientific fraud." ''Cell'' 124.5 (2006): 873-875.</ref>. This is a factual case.
 
<references />
 
<references />
|Important Because=But looking beyond the headlines, the repercussions of scientific misconduct also resonate on a more personal level<ref>https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(06)00249-2?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS0092867406002492%3Fshowall%3Dtrue</ref>.
+
|Important Because=<br />
 
 
 
 
Journal
 
 
 
Factual
 
 
<references />
 
<references />
 
|Important For=researchers
 
|Important For=researchers
Line 16: Line 11:
 
|Has Link=https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(06)00249-2?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS0092867406002492%3Fshowall%3Dtrue
 
|Has Link=https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(06)00249-2?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS0092867406002492%3Fshowall%3Dtrue
 
}}
 
}}
{{Related To}}
+
{{Related To
 +
|Related To Theme=Theme:5f65272f-6e95-4768-8236-bc821a97f3d8;Theme:047c3bec-1747-499b-b6d5-684cbfb81edd
 +
}}
 
{{Tags
 
{{Tags
 
|Involves=Eric Poehlman; Gerald P. Schatten
 
|Involves=Eric Poehlman; Gerald P. Schatten

Revision as of 15:56, 27 May 2020

Cases

The Aftermath of Scientific Fraud

What is this about?

Scientific fraud became front-page news at the end of last year, when a South Korean stem cell researcher admitted to fabricating data about cloned human embryonic stem cell lines that he claimed were created from patients. Much of the press coverage focused on the fallout of his actions on the public's trust in science and the already fragile image of stem cell research[1]. This is a factual case.

  1. Bonetta, Laura. "The aftermath of scientific fraud." Cell 124.5 (2006): 873-875.

Why is this important?


For whom is this important?

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6