Difference between revisions of "Resource:31a4701c-46bd-47c2-b7f8-3f1d2308e8be"
From The Embassy of Good Science
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Resource | {{Resource | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
| − | |Title=Human Research Violations By | + | |Title=Human Research Violations By Eye Doctor Showcase A National Problem |
|Is About=This case study presents a number of research ethics violations by a distinguished eye doctor who has helped in developing break-through medical treatments. | |Is About=This case study presents a number of research ethics violations by a distinguished eye doctor who has helped in developing break-through medical treatments. | ||
|Important Because=The authors of this blog provide an analysis that raises several interesting points. These concern not only the ethics violations by the researcher but also the response from a number of bodies, not least the doctor's institution, the ORI (Office of Research Integrity) and the Office for Human Research Protection. | |Important Because=The authors of this blog provide an analysis that raises several interesting points. These concern not only the ethics violations by the researcher but also the response from a number of bodies, not least the doctor's institution, the ORI (Office of Research Integrity) and the Office for Human Research Protection. | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
{{Related To}} | {{Related To}} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
| − | |||
|Has Location=USA | |Has Location=USA | ||
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Informed consent; Research with Humans | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Informed consent; Research with Humans | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:41, 22 June 2021
ResourcesCases
Human Research Violations By Eye Doctor Showcase A National Problem
What is this about?
This case study presents a number of research ethics violations by a distinguished eye doctor who has helped in developing break-through medical treatments.
Why is this important?
The authors of this blog provide an analysis that raises several interesting points. These concern not only the ethics violations by the researcher but also the response from a number of bodies, not least the doctor's institution, the ORI (Office of Research Integrity) and the Office for Human Research Protection.
