Difference between revisions of "Resource:3264c547-bf25-48c5-bc4f-367adde2752b"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Resource | {{Resource | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
− | |Title=Seven Ways to | + | |Title=Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Duplicate Publication |
|Is About=This is the factual case of an author whose long excerpts of research output appear in two different articles in two separate journals. | |Is About=This is the factual case of an author whose long excerpts of research output appear in two different articles in two separate journals. | ||
|Important Because=This case is another reminder of the many different formats plagiarism can take. It also demonstrates that not every single case that appears to be plagiarism is actually a research misconduct practice. | |Important Because=This case is another reminder of the many different formats plagiarism can take. It also demonstrates that not every single case that appears to be plagiarism is actually a research misconduct practice. |
Latest revision as of 14:24, 5 March 2021
Cases
Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Duplicate Publication
What is this about?
This is the factual case of an author whose long excerpts of research output appear in two different articles in two separate journals.
Why is this important?
This case is another reminder of the many different formats plagiarism can take. It also demonstrates that not every single case that appears to be plagiarism is actually a research misconduct practice.
The case explores the fine lines among practices such as ‘quoting oneself’, ‘duplicate submission/publication’, ‘plagiarism’, ‘deviation from accepted practices’, ‘reprints’, and when such practices are acceptable or not.