Difference between revisions of "Resource:3ed20282-71b3-4ef0-bf37-d07d18d6674f"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Resource | {{Resource | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
| − | |Title=The | + | |Title=The Extent and Causes of Academic Text Recycling or ‘Self-Plagiarism’ |
| − | |Is About=This study investigated the extent of problematic text recycling in order to obtain understanding of its occurrence in four research areas: biochemistry & molecular biology, economics, history and psychology. They also investigated some potential reasons and motives for authors to recycle their text, by testing current hypotheses in scholarly literature regarding the causes of text recycling<ref> | + | |Is About=This study investigated the extent of problematic text recycling in order to obtain understanding of its occurrence in four research areas: biochemistry & molecular biology, economics, history and psychology. They also investigated some potential reasons and motives for authors to recycle their text, by testing current hypotheses in scholarly literature regarding the causes of text recycling<ref>Horbach, SPJM Serge, and W. Willem Halffman. "The extent and causes of academic text recycling or ‘self-plagiarism’." ''Research Policy'' 48.2 (2019): 492-502.</ref>. This is a factual case. |
| − | |Important Because=Among the various forms of academic misconduct, text recycling or ‘self-plagiarism’ holds a particularly contentious position as a new way to game the reward system of science<ref> | + | <references /> |
| − | + | |Important Because=Among the various forms of academic misconduct, text recycling or ‘self-plagiarism’ holds a particularly contentious position as a new way to game the reward system of science<ref>Horbach, SPJM Serge, and W. Willem Halffman. "The extent and causes of academic text recycling or ‘self-plagiarism’." ''Research Policy'' 48.2 (2019): 492-502.</ref>. | |
| − | + | <references /> | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|Important For=Researchers | |Important For=Researchers | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 14: | Line 11: | ||
|Has Link=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733317301543?via%3Dihub | |Has Link=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733317301543?via%3Dihub | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | {{Related To}} | + | {{Related To |
| + | |Related To Theme=Theme:Ed7ce22e-667a-44a8-a3d0-2abdd0d37b1a | ||
| + | }} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
|Involves=Peter Nijkamp | |Involves=Peter Nijkamp | ||
Revision as of 21:55, 26 May 2020
ResourcesCases
The Extent and Causes of Academic Text Recycling or ‘Self-Plagiarism’
What is this about?
This study investigated the extent of problematic text recycling in order to obtain understanding of its occurrence in four research areas: biochemistry & molecular biology, economics, history and psychology. They also investigated some potential reasons and motives for authors to recycle their text, by testing current hypotheses in scholarly literature regarding the causes of text recycling[1]. This is a factual case.
- ↑ Horbach, SPJM Serge, and W. Willem Halffman. "The extent and causes of academic text recycling or ‘self-plagiarism’." Research Policy 48.2 (2019): 492-502.
Why is this important?
Among the various forms of academic misconduct, text recycling or ‘self-plagiarism’ holds a particularly contentious position as a new way to game the reward system of science[1].
- ↑ Horbach, SPJM Serge, and W. Willem Halffman. "The extent and causes of academic text recycling or ‘self-plagiarism’." Research Policy 48.2 (2019): 492-502.
