Difference between revisions of "Resource:3ed20282-71b3-4ef0-bf37-d07d18d6674f"

From The Embassy of Good Science
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Title=The Extent and Causes of Academic Text Recycling or ‘Self-Plagiarism’
 
|Title=The Extent and Causes of Academic Text Recycling or ‘Self-Plagiarism’
|Is About=This study investigated the extent of problematic text recycling in order to obtain understanding of its occurrence in four research areas: biochemistry & molecular biology, economics, history and psychology. They also investigated some potential reasons and motives for authors to recycle their text, by testing current hypotheses in scholarly literature regarding the causes of text recycling<ref>Horbach, SPJM Serge, and W. Willem Halffman. "The extent and causes of academic text recycling or ‘self-plagiarism’." ''Research Policy'' 48.2 (2019): 492-502.</ref>. This is a factual case.
+
|Is About=This is a factual case.
 
<references />
 
<references />
|Important Because=Among the various forms of academic misconduct, text recycling or ‘self-plagiarism’ holds a particularly contentious position as a new way to game the reward system of science<ref>Horbach, SPJM Serge, and W. Willem Halffman. "The extent and causes of academic text recycling or ‘self-plagiarism’." ''Research Policy'' 48.2 (2019): 492-502.</ref>.
+
|Important Because=<br />
 
<references />
 
<references />
 
|Important For=Researchers
 
|Important For=Researchers

Revision as of 16:03, 26 October 2020

Cases

The Extent and Causes of Academic Text Recycling or ‘Self-Plagiarism’

What is this about?

This is a factual case.

Why is this important?


For whom is this important?

Other information

Virtues & Values
Good Practices & Misconduct
Research Area
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6