Difference between revisions of "Resource:3f227dbd-d5c0-4d74-bb77-e0887e9b3822"

From The Embassy of Good Science
(Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Cases |Title=Failed Patenting Negotiations in Collaborative Research |Is About=Researchers within a multi-institutional project did not devise a cont...")
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
|Title=Failed Patenting Negotiations in Collaborative Research
 
|Title=Failed Patenting Negotiations in Collaborative Research
 
|Is About=Researchers within a multi-institutional project did not devise a contract regarding intellectual property until it was too late.
 
|Is About=Researchers within a multi-institutional project did not devise a contract regarding intellectual property until it was too late.
|Important For=All stakeholders in research
+
|Important For=Clinical researchers
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Link
 
{{Link
Line 13: Line 13:
 
{{Tags
 
{{Tags
 
|Has Virtue And Value=Accountability; Reliability
 
|Has Virtue And Value=Accountability; Reliability
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Financial conflict of interest
+
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Financial conflict of interest; Collaborative research; Intellectual property
 
|Related To Research Area=LS - Life Sciences
 
|Related To Research Area=LS - Life Sciences
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 11:00, 6 April 2021

Cases

Failed Patenting Negotiations in Collaborative Research

What is this about?

Researchers within a multi-institutional project did not devise a contract regarding intellectual property until it was too late.

For whom is this important?

Other information

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6