Difference between revisions of "Resource:402ee986-3e2b-4cb5-b76b-d528fd8b9352"

From The Embassy of Good Science
(Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Cases |Title=In the matter of J Hendrik Schön |Is About=This is a factual case of misconduct by physics researcher Hendrik Schön. |Important Becaus...")
 
 
Line 14: Line 14:
 
|Has Virtue And Value=Reliability; Honesty
 
|Has Virtue And Value=Reliability; Honesty
 
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Data fabrication and falsification; misconduct by company
 
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Data fabrication and falsification; misconduct by company
 +
|Related To Research Area=PE - Physical Sciences and Engineering
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 17:08, 22 June 2021

Cases

In the matter of J Hendrik Schön

What is this about?

This is a factual case of misconduct by physics researcher Hendrik Schön.

Why is this important?

David Goodstein, professor of physics, presents this case with an interesting discussion of several points, including some common 'danger factors' usually present in cases of research misconduct and lessons to be learnt.

For whom is this important?

Other information

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6