Difference between revisions of "Resource:43c4d969-6b45-47f1-b96b-a0da8fe7ef29"

From The Embassy of Good Science
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Title=Anonymity Revisited
 
|Title=Anonymity Revisited
|Is About=This case is about an applied medical anthropologist, Mary Jones, who wrote a series of articles when she was working in an urban black community in the United States. She wrote her articles in an anonymous way so that individuals and/or the community would not be harmed. However, members of the community started a discussion because they were surprised that the name of the community health center and the name of the town were not given.
+
|Is About=This fictional case is about an applied medical anthropologist who wrote a series of articles when she was working in an urban black community in the United States. She wrote her articles in an anonymous way so that individuals and/or the community would not be harmed. However, members of the community started a discussion because they were surprised that the name of the community health center and the name of the town were not given.
 
|Important Because=Anthropological conventions specify the use of pseudonyms in certain types of anthropological reporting, specifically if there was any chance that individuals or a community might be harmed.
 
|Important Because=Anthropological conventions specify the use of pseudonyms in certain types of anthropological reporting, specifically if there was any chance that individuals or a community might be harmed.
 
 
Website
 
 
Fictional
 
 
|Important For=Researchers
 
|Important For=Researchers
 
}}
 
}}
Line 14: Line 9:
 
|Has Link=https://www.americananthro.org/LearnAndTeach/Content.aspx?ItemNumber=12923&RDtoken=16518&userID=5089&navItemNumber=731
 
|Has Link=https://www.americananthro.org/LearnAndTeach/Content.aspx?ItemNumber=12923&RDtoken=16518&userID=5089&navItemNumber=731
 
}}
 
}}
{{Related To}}
+
{{Related To
 +
|Related To Theme=Theme:540c9ba0-bc9c-4311-b3e1-7a650d2b9f0f
 +
}}
 
{{Tags
 
{{Tags
 
|Has Location=USA; United States
 
|Has Location=USA; United States

Revision as of 09:56, 26 May 2020

Cases

Anonymity Revisited

What is this about?

This fictional case is about an applied medical anthropologist who wrote a series of articles when she was working in an urban black community in the United States. She wrote her articles in an anonymous way so that individuals and/or the community would not be harmed. However, members of the community started a discussion because they were surprised that the name of the community health center and the name of the town were not given.

Why is this important?

Anthropological conventions specify the use of pseudonyms in certain types of anthropological reporting, specifically if there was any chance that individuals or a community might be harmed.

For whom is this important?

Other information

Virtues & Values
Good Practices & Misconduct
Research Area
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6