Difference between revisions of "Resource:4be659bc-2261-4e62-b4ed-d746e9f2c5be"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Title=Scientist ousted from cancer study declines to testify to House panel | |Title=Scientist ousted from cancer study declines to testify to House panel | ||
|Is About=Data falsification in a series of studies which showed that lumpectomy was as effective as removing the entire breast for preventing recurrence in many women with early cancer. | |Is About=Data falsification in a series of studies which showed that lumpectomy was as effective as removing the entire breast for preventing recurrence in many women with early cancer. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | This is a factual case. | ||
|Important Because=To give insight in different ways of cheating in clinical trials. | |Important Because=To give insight in different ways of cheating in clinical trials. | ||
| Line 8: | Line 11: | ||
Journal | Journal | ||
| − | + | <br /> | |
|Important For=researchers; research leaders; All stakeholders in research; phd students | |Important For=researchers; research leaders; All stakeholders in research; phd students | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 13:40, 18 May 2020
ResourcesCases
Scientist ousted from cancer study declines to testify to House panel
What is this about?
Data falsification in a series of studies which showed that lumpectomy was as effective as removing the entire breast for preventing recurrence in many women with early cancer.
Why is this important?
To give insight in different ways of cheating in clinical trials.
Journal
