Difference between revisions of "Resource:4be659bc-2261-4e62-b4ed-d746e9f2c5be"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Resource | {{Resource | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
| − | |Title=Scientist | + | |Title=Scientist Ousted From Cancer Study Declines to Testify to House Panel |
| − | |Is About=Data falsification in a series of studies which showed that lumpectomy was as effective as removing the entire breast for preventing recurrence in many women with early cancer. | + | |Is About=Data falsification in a series of studies which showed that lumpectomy was as effective as removing the entire breast for preventing recurrence in many women with early cancer. This is a factual case. |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | This is a factual case. | ||
|Important Because=To give insight in different ways of cheating in clinical trials. | |Important Because=To give insight in different ways of cheating in clinical trials. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|Important For=researchers; research leaders; All stakeholders in research; phd students | |Important For=researchers; research leaders; All stakeholders in research; phd students | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 17: | Line 9: | ||
|Has Link=https://www.nytimes.com/1994/04/12/science/doctor-s-world-scientist-ousted-cancer-study-declines-testify-house-panel.html | |Has Link=https://www.nytimes.com/1994/04/12/science/doctor-s-world-scientist-ousted-cancer-study-declines-testify-house-panel.html | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | {{Related To}} | + | {{Related To |
| + | |Related To Theme=Theme:047c3bec-1747-499b-b6d5-684cbfb81edd;Theme:5f65272f-6e95-4768-8236-bc821a97f3d8 | ||
| + | }} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
|Involves=Roger Poisson; Bernard Fisher | |Involves=Roger Poisson; Bernard Fisher | ||
Revision as of 21:00, 26 May 2020
ResourcesCases
Scientist Ousted From Cancer Study Declines to Testify to House Panel
What is this about?
Data falsification in a series of studies which showed that lumpectomy was as effective as removing the entire breast for preventing recurrence in many women with early cancer. This is a factual case.
Why is this important?
To give insight in different ways of cheating in clinical trials.
