Difference between revisions of "Resource:4be659bc-2261-4e62-b4ed-d746e9f2c5be"

From The Embassy of Good Science
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Title=Scientist Ousted From Cancer Study Declines to Testify to House Panel
 
|Title=Scientist Ousted From Cancer Study Declines to Testify to House Panel
|Is About=Data falsification in a series of studies which showed that lumpectomy was as effective as removing the entire breast for preventing recurrence in many women with early cancer. This is a factual case.
+
|Is About=This is a factual case.
 
|Important Because=To give insight in different ways of cheating in clinical trials.
 
|Important Because=To give insight in different ways of cheating in clinical trials.
 
|Important For=researchers; research leaders; All stakeholders in research; phd students
 
|Important For=researchers; research leaders; All stakeholders in research; phd students

Revision as of 15:52, 26 October 2020

Cases

Scientist Ousted From Cancer Study Declines to Testify to House Panel

What is this about?

This is a factual case.

Why is this important?

To give insight in different ways of cheating in clinical trials.

For whom is this important?

Other information

When
Where
Virtues & Values
Good Practices & Misconduct
Research Area
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6