Difference between revisions of "Resource:53b0fc1a-fe70-48ab-9502-4d1258ac4218"
From The Embassy of Good Science
(Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Cases |Title=A University of Liverpool investigation determined that a former researcher there fabricated his data |Is About=It describes the case of...") |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
|Title=A University of Liverpool investigation determined that a former researcher there fabricated his data | |Title=A University of Liverpool investigation determined that a former researcher there fabricated his data | ||
| − | |Is About= | + | |Is About=In 2017 a promising young liver specialist, was found to have fabricated spectroscopic findings. Several retractions followed the investigation.<ref>https://retractionwatch.com/2020/02/07/journal-flags-papers-two-years-after-university-investigation-finds-researcher-faked-data/</ref> |
| − | |Important For=Researchers | + | <references /> |
| + | |Important Because=Revealing, investigating, reporting, and following up fraud can be resource consuming. | ||
| + | |Important For=Researchers; PhD students | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Link | {{Link | ||
|Has Link=https://news.liverpool.ac.uk/2018/07/06/research-misconduct-update/ | |Has Link=https://news.liverpool.ac.uk/2018/07/06/research-misconduct-update/ | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | {{Related To}} | + | {{Related To |
| − | {{Tags}} | + | |Related To Theme=Theme:5f65272f-6e95-4768-8236-bc821a97f3d8 |
| + | }} | ||
| + | {{Tags | ||
| + | |Has Timepoint=2017 | ||
| + | |Has Location=United Kingdom | ||
| + | |Has Virtue And Value=Diligence; Honesty; Objectivity; Reliability; Trustworthiness | ||
| + | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Factual case | ||
| + | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 11:37, 17 September 2020
ResourcesCases
A University of Liverpool investigation determined that a former researcher there fabricated his data
What is this about?
In 2017 a promising young liver specialist, was found to have fabricated spectroscopic findings. Several retractions followed the investigation.[1]
Why is this important?
Revealing, investigating, reporting, and following up fraud can be resource consuming.
