Difference between revisions of "Resource:5b8e9f7c-7c80-4aa5-9a01-cada03fe4533"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Resource | {{Resource | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
| − | |Title= | + | |Title=Carlo Croce: data falsification and other scientific misconduct |
| − | |Is About=This is a factual case. | + | |Is About=This is a factual case about Carlo Croce, a famous cancer researcher who has been charged with data falsification and other scientific misconduct. |
| − | |Important For=Researchers | + | |Important Because=This is a real case which can be discussed and analyzed as an example of scientific misconduct. |
| + | |Important For=Researchers; PhD Students; Research integrity trainers | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Link | {{Link | ||
|Has Link=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/08/science/cancer-carlo-croce.html | |Has Link=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/08/science/cancer-carlo-croce.html | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | {{Related To}} | + | {{Related To |
| + | |Related To Theme=Theme:047c3bec-1747-499b-b6d5-684cbfb81edd;Theme:28a0859b-9e52-4af4-97f0-b0f8eeac1f1c | ||
| + | }} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
|Has Timepoint=2013 | |Has Timepoint=2013 | ||
|Has Location=United States; Ohio State University | |Has Location=United States; Ohio State University | ||
| − | |Has Virtue And Value=Honesty | + | |Has Virtue And Value=Honesty; Integrity; Professional courtesy and fairness |
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Falsification; Image manipulation | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Falsification; Image manipulation | ||
| − | |Related To Research Area=Biological Sciences | + | |Related To Research Area=Biological Sciences; LS 07.06 - Gene therapy, cell therapy, regenerative medicine |
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 18:41, 7 February 2021
ResourcesCases
Carlo Croce: data falsification and other scientific misconduct
What is this about?
This is a factual case about Carlo Croce, a famous cancer researcher who has been charged with data falsification and other scientific misconduct.
Why is this important?
This is a real case which can be discussed and analyzed as an example of scientific misconduct.
