Difference between revisions of "Resource:606c4f6b-253b-475e-8ee3-d2762e65bdbe"

From The Embassy of Good Science
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Title=The Epistemic Integrity of Scientific Research
 
|Title=The Epistemic Integrity of Scientific Research
|Is About=This case describes a concept of epistemic integrity that is based on the property of deceptiveness, and argues that this concept does meet Carnap’s four requirements of explication. To illustrate and support their claims they use several examples from scientific practice, mainly from biomedical research<ref>De Winter, Jan, and Laszlo Kosolosky. "The epistemic integrity of scientific research." ''Science and Engineering Ethics'' 19.3 (2013): 757-774.</ref>. This is a factual case.
+
|Is About=This case describes a concept of epistemic integrity.
 
<references />
 
<references />
|Important Because=We live in a world in which scientific expertise and its epistemic authority become more important. On the other hand, the financial interests in research, which could potentially corrupt science, are increasing. Due to these two tendencies, a concern for the integrity of scientific research becomes increasingly vital<ref>De Winter, Jan, and Laszlo Kosolosky. "The epistemic integrity of scientific research." ''Science and Engineering Ethics'' 19.3 (2013): 757-774.</ref>.
+
|Important Because=<br />
 
<references />
 
<references />
 
|Important For=Researchers
 
|Important For=Researchers

Revision as of 16:07, 26 October 2020

Cases

The Epistemic Integrity of Scientific Research

What is this about?

This case describes a concept of epistemic integrity.

Why is this important?


For whom is this important?

Other information

When
Good Practices & Misconduct
Research Area
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6