Difference between revisions of "Resource:720a2df3-c584-4b5a-a6ba-1b5636c0ae49"

From The Embassy of Good Science
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Title=The Paolo Macchiarini Case
 
|Title=The Paolo Macchiarini Case
|Is About=Paolo Macchiarini was considered a pioneer in the field of regenerative medicine using both biological and synthetic scaffolds seeded with patients’ own stem cells as trachea transplants. Macchiarini has been accused of research misconduct and unethically performing experimental surgeries, even on relatively healthy patients. Six of the eight patients who received one of his synthetic trachea transplants have died. Also, accusations have been published that Macchiarini had falsified some of his academic credentials on résumés<ref>https://www.nrin.nl/ri-collection/library/case-histories/macchiarini-case/</ref>.
+
|Is About=Paolo Macchiarini was considered a pioneer in the field of regenerative medicine using both biological and synthetic scaffolds seeded with patients’ own stem cells as trachea transplants. Macchiarini has been accused of research misconduct and unethically performing experimental surgeries, even on relatively healthy patients. Six of the eight patients who received one of his synthetic trachea transplants have died. Also, accusations have been published that Macchiarini had falsified some of his academic credentials on résumés<ref>https://www.nrin.nl/ri-collection/library/case-histories/macchiarini-case/</ref>. This is a factual case.
 
 
 
 
This is a factual case.
 
 
<references />
 
<references />
 
|Important Because=The Royal Swedisch Academy of Sciences spoke of a ‘crisis of confidence in Swedish medical research’ after the Karolinska Institute, where Macchiarini worked, first stated that Macchiarini was found guilty of research fraud, but was found not guilty by the second inquiry. As a result of the case, several measures have been planned by [https://ki.se/en/about/action-plan-following-the-investigations-of-the-macchiarini-case Karolinska Institute]. The measures include teaching research integrity to junior scientists, new procedures in cases of suspected scientific misconduct and a compulsary log book for research documentation<ref>https://www.nrin.nl/ri-collection/library/case-histories/macchiarini-case/<br /></ref> .
 
|Important Because=The Royal Swedisch Academy of Sciences spoke of a ‘crisis of confidence in Swedish medical research’ after the Karolinska Institute, where Macchiarini worked, first stated that Macchiarini was found guilty of research fraud, but was found not guilty by the second inquiry. As a result of the case, several measures have been planned by [https://ki.se/en/about/action-plan-following-the-investigations-of-the-macchiarini-case Karolinska Institute]. The measures include teaching research integrity to junior scientists, new procedures in cases of suspected scientific misconduct and a compulsary log book for research documentation<ref>https://www.nrin.nl/ri-collection/library/case-histories/macchiarini-case/<br /></ref> .
 
 
Website
 
  
 
<br />
 
<br />
Line 19: Line 13:
 
|Has Link=https://www.nrin.nl/ri-collection/library/case-histories/macchiarini-case/
 
|Has Link=https://www.nrin.nl/ri-collection/library/case-histories/macchiarini-case/
 
}}
 
}}
{{Related To}}
+
{{Related To
 +
|Related To Theme=Theme:28a0859b-9e52-4af4-97f0-b0f8eeac1f1c
 +
}}
 
{{Tags
 
{{Tags
 
|Involves=Paolo Macchiarini; Royal Swedisch Academy of Sciences; Karolinska Institute
 
|Involves=Paolo Macchiarini; Royal Swedisch Academy of Sciences; Karolinska Institute

Revision as of 21:29, 26 May 2020

Cases

The Paolo Macchiarini Case

What is this about?

Paolo Macchiarini was considered a pioneer in the field of regenerative medicine using both biological and synthetic scaffolds seeded with patients’ own stem cells as trachea transplants. Macchiarini has been accused of research misconduct and unethically performing experimental surgeries, even on relatively healthy patients. Six of the eight patients who received one of his synthetic trachea transplants have died. Also, accusations have been published that Macchiarini had falsified some of his academic credentials on résumés[1]. This is a factual case.

Why is this important?

The Royal Swedisch Academy of Sciences spoke of a ‘crisis of confidence in Swedish medical research’ after the Karolinska Institute, where Macchiarini worked, first stated that Macchiarini was found guilty of research fraud, but was found not guilty by the second inquiry. As a result of the case, several measures have been planned by Karolinska Institute. The measures include teaching research integrity to junior scientists, new procedures in cases of suspected scientific misconduct and a compulsary log book for research documentation[1] .


For whom is this important?

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6