Difference between revisions of "Resource:74b057f6-ed6a-4f67-b2aa-2ac49b8eea42"
From The Embassy of Good Science
(Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Cases |Title=U.S. gov’t researchers withdraw climate paper after using pseudonyms |Is About=This blog post describes a case where two scientists pu...") |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|Is About=This blog post describes a case where two scientists publish a paper using pseudonyms. Both authors have published with their real names in the past. The paper has gone through normal blind peer-review. | |Is About=This blog post describes a case where two scientists publish a paper using pseudonyms. Both authors have published with their real names in the past. The paper has gone through normal blind peer-review. | ||
|Important Because=It highlights that using pseudonyms affects the reliability of claims and could result in the erosion of trust in academic publications. | |Important Because=It highlights that using pseudonyms affects the reliability of claims and could result in the erosion of trust in academic publications. | ||
| − | |Important For=Journal editors; | + | |Important For=Journal editors; Researchers |
}} | }} | ||
{{Link | {{Link | ||
Latest revision as of 16:11, 18 June 2021
ResourcesCases
U.S. gov’t researchers withdraw climate paper after using pseudonyms
What is this about?
This blog post describes a case where two scientists publish a paper using pseudonyms. Both authors have published with their real names in the past. The paper has gone through normal blind peer-review.
Why is this important?
It highlights that using pseudonyms affects the reliability of claims and could result in the erosion of trust in academic publications.
