Difference between revisions of "Resource:75d1fe41-31cd-4ac5-b70d-5fdde322989c"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Cases |Title=WHO formally retracts opioid guidelines that came under fire |Is About=. |Important Because=. |Important For=Researchers }} {{Link |Has...") |
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
|Title=WHO formally retracts opioid guidelines that came under fire | |Title=WHO formally retracts opioid guidelines that came under fire | ||
| − | |Is About=. | + | |Is About=This case is about the World Health Organization (WHO), who retracted its controversial guidelines on the use of opoid analgetics in 2011 and 2012. |
| − | |Important Because=. | + | |
| + | |||
| + | This is a factual case. | ||
| + | |Important Because=It is important to stay critical in all cases. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Website Blog (Retractionwatch) | ||
|Important For=Researchers | |Important For=Researchers | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 13: | Line 19: | ||
|Has Timepoint=10-1-2020 | |Has Timepoint=10-1-2020 | ||
|Has Virtue And Value=Honesty; Accountability | |Has Virtue And Value=Honesty; Accountability | ||
| − | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Conflict of interest | + | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Conflict of interest; Clinical Study Retractions |
|Related To Research Area=Clinical medicine | |Related To Research Area=Clinical medicine | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 09:11, 18 May 2020
ResourcesCases
WHO formally retracts opioid guidelines that came under fire
What is this about?
This case is about the World Health Organization (WHO), who retracted its controversial guidelines on the use of opoid analgetics in 2011 and 2012.
Why is this important?
It is important to stay critical in all cases.
