Difference between revisions of "Resource:7afd29a3-0098-43db-b80f-bdc79282a1c9"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
|Title=Seven Ways to Plagiarize: Handling Real Allegations of Research Misconduct; Case #6: The Magazine Surprise | |Title=Seven Ways to Plagiarize: Handling Real Allegations of Research Misconduct; Case #6: The Magazine Surprise | ||
| − | |Is About=This | + | |Is About=This presents seven anonymized case of allegations of plagiary and from these draws specific conclusions and advice to authors and administrators. |
| − | |Important For=Researchers | + | |Important Because=Examples are useful for recognizing, highlight, and avoiding plagiary. |
| + | |Important For=Researchers; Administrators; Doctoral students; Early career researchers; Editors | ||
| + | |Has Best Practice=Specific advice for authors: "Do not put your name on a manuscript written by someone else. • Do not insert someone else’s text as a place-holder in a draft manuscript. The original might not be replaced later. • Do not copy verbatim the background section of someone else’s paper. Copying an amount beyond fair use might violate copyright law. The background section could be incomplete or erroneous. A subsequent inquiry or investigation would consume a lot of time from faculty and administrators, and it could embarrass the institution. • Include references to all sources, with appropriate citations, in all manuscripts and grant proposals. • Take allegations of plagiarism to a research integrity officer. If there is no research integrity officer, then consult a knowledgeable administrator"<ref>Loui, Michael C. "Seven ways to plagiarize: Handling real allegations of research misconduct." ''Science and Engineering Ethics'' 8.4 (2002): 529-539.</ref> | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Link | {{Link | ||
| Line 9: | Line 11: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Related To | {{Related To | ||
| + | |Related To Resource=Resource:A0df9be7-401a-43ba-af41-245019119182;Resource:Ca0b7f16-c130-40d9-bae4-c92c7a0d025a;Resource:557a3563-4704-413c-80de-ccb5f8c0b748 | ||
|Related To Theme=Theme:02592695-e4f8-473c-a944-adfe0d8094c0 | |Related To Theme=Theme:02592695-e4f8-473c-a944-adfe0d8094c0 | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 14:36, 11 September 2020
ResourcesCases
Seven Ways to Plagiarize: Handling Real Allegations of Research Misconduct; Case #6: The Magazine Surprise
What is this about?
This presents seven anonymized case of allegations of plagiary and from these draws specific conclusions and advice to authors and administrators.
Why is this important?
Examples are useful for recognizing, highlight, and avoiding plagiary.
For whom is this important?
What are the best practices?
Specific advice for authors: "Do not put your name on a manuscript written by someone else. • Do not insert someone else’s text as a place-holder in a draft manuscript. The original might not be replaced later. • Do not copy verbatim the background section of someone else’s paper. Copying an amount beyond fair use might violate copyright law. The background section could be incomplete or erroneous. A subsequent inquiry or investigation would consume a lot of time from faculty and administrators, and it could embarrass the institution. • Include references to all sources, with appropriate citations, in all manuscripts and grant proposals. • Take allegations of plagiarism to a research integrity officer. If there is no research integrity officer, then consult a knowledgeable administrator"[1]
Other information
- ↑ Loui, Michael C. "Seven ways to plagiarize: Handling real allegations of research misconduct." Science and Engineering Ethics 8.4 (2002): 529-539.
