Difference between revisions of "Resource:7bfab1c1-adcd-4e8b-b8e4-44f1f7b992c5"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
{{Related To}} | {{Related To}} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
| + | |Has Timepoint=1992; 1994 | ||
|Has Location=Denmark | |Has Location=Denmark | ||
|Has Virtue And Value=Honesty | |Has Virtue And Value=Honesty | ||
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Plagiarism | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Plagiarism | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 16:02, 10 February 2020
ResourcesCases
From case management to prevention of scientific dishonesty in Denmark
What is this about?
Denmark has had its share of serious scientific fraud that occured many years ago. It was, therefore, some widely published cases from the United States around 10 that motivated the Danish Medical Research Council to establish the Danish Committee on Scientific Dishonesty in November 12, a national committee covering health sciences[1].
Why is this important?
It was considered important that a broad spectrum of the health sciences was represented on the committee. The main reason for this was that decisions on honesty/dishonesty, being by their nature inexact and judgemental, must reflect the general culture in the research environment[1].
