Difference between revisions of "Resource:81d54c73-e442-47d8-923c-7576d7bdd60e"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Cases |Title=The Problem With Michael LaCour’s Rebuttal |Is About=. |Important Because=. |Important For=Researchers }} {{Link |Has Link=http://blog...") |
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
|Title=The Problem With Michael LaCour’s Rebuttal | |Title=The Problem With Michael LaCour’s Rebuttal | ||
| − | |Is About=. | + | |Is About=This case is about Michael LaCour, a political science PhD student, who was accused of scientific fraud. He did not agree with the retraction of his paper which was requested by his co-author. |
| − | |Important Because=. | + | |
| + | |||
| + | This is a factual case. | ||
| + | |Important Because=Not all cases of retracted papers concern scientific fraud on purpose. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Website Blog (Discover) | ||
|Important For=Researchers | |Important For=Researchers | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 11: | Line 17: | ||
{{Related To}} | {{Related To}} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
| + | |Involves=Michael LaCour | ||
|Has Timepoint=1-6-2015 | |Has Timepoint=1-6-2015 | ||
| − | |Has Location=USA | + | |Has Location=USA; United States |
|Has Virtue And Value=Honesty | |Has Virtue And Value=Honesty | ||
| − | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Fabrication | + | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Fabrication; Controversiology |
|Related To Research Area=Political science | |Related To Research Area=Political science | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 09:43, 18 May 2020
ResourcesCases
The Problem With Michael LaCour’s Rebuttal
What is this about?
This case is about Michael LaCour, a political science PhD student, who was accused of scientific fraud. He did not agree with the retraction of his paper which was requested by his co-author.
Why is this important?
Not all cases of retracted papers concern scientific fraud on purpose.
