Difference between revisions of "Resource:8367e13a-b836-4237-bfdd-e2d9dd491329"

From The Embassy of Good Science
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Title=Bothered and Bewildered But not Bewitched
 
|Title=Bothered and Bewildered But not Bewitched
|Is About=This case is about article amendments which unfortunately became a daily practice. This is a factual case.
+
|Is About=This is a factual case.
 
|Important Because=When an article is being published, one assumes that the co-authors are aware of its publication. Unfortunately, that is not always the case.
 
|Important Because=When an article is being published, one assumes that the co-authors are aware of its publication. Unfortunately, that is not always the case.
 
|Important For=Researchers
 
|Important For=Researchers

Revision as of 16:03, 26 October 2020

Cases

Bothered and Bewildered But not Bewitched

What is this about?

This is a factual case.

Why is this important?

When an article is being published, one assumes that the co-authors are aware of its publication. Unfortunately, that is not always the case.

For whom is this important?

Other information

When
Virtues & Values
Good Practices & Misconduct
Research Area
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6