Revision as of 15:14, 19 October 2020

Resources

Cases

The Ethics of Public Health Research on Less Expensive, Less Effective Interventions

This is a factual case.

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 |Resource Type=Cases
 |Title=The Ethics of Public Health Research on Less Expensive, Less Effective Interventions
-|Is About=The Kennedy Krieger lead paint study stirred controversial questions about whether research designed to develop less expensive interventions that are not as effective as existing treatments can be ethically warranted<ref>Buchanan, David R., and Franklin G. Miller. "Justice and fairness in the Kennedy Krieger Institute lead paint study: the ethics of public health research on less expensive, less effective interventions." ''American journal of public health'' 96.5 (2006): 781-787.</ref>. This is a factual case.
+|Is About=This is a factual case.
 <references />
-|Important Because=Critics questioned the social value of such research and alleged that it sanctions a double standard, exploits participants, and is complicit in perpetuating the social injustice<ref>Buchanan, David R., and Franklin G. Miller. "Justice and fairness in the Kennedy Krieger Institute lead paint study: the ethics of public health research on less expensive, less effective interventions." ''American journal of public health'' 96.5 (2006): 781-787.</ref>.
+|Important Because=<br />
 <references />
 |Important For=Researchers