Difference between revisions of "Resource:8d4936a8-4fe5-4768-b7e5-98c82524be34"
From The Embassy of Good Science
(Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Cases |Title=The publication of controversial views |Is About=This blog post describes the aftermath of a journal publication about the benefits of c...") |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|Has Timepoint=2017 | |Has Timepoint=2017 | ||
|Has Location=United States; Portland State University | |Has Location=United States; Portland State University | ||
| − | |Has Virtue And Value= | + | |Has Virtue And Value=Respect |
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Academic Freedom | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Academic Freedom | ||
|Related To Research Area=SH 02.07 - Political systems and institutions, governance | |Related To Research Area=SH 02.07 - Political systems and institutions, governance | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 12:48, 6 April 2021
ResourcesCases
The publication of controversial views
What is this about?
This blog post describes the aftermath of a journal publication about the benefits of colonialism that drew critical reactions.
Why is this important?
It shows the limits of academic freedom, and provides a factual case that could be used to explain where freedom ends and disrespect starts.
