Difference between revisions of "Resource:A5e7428e-3972-40b6-b410-cfde15e088d2"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
|Title=Misrepresenting the characteristics of research participants in psychiatric studies | |Title=Misrepresenting the characteristics of research participants in psychiatric studies | ||
| − | |Is About= | + | |Is About=This factual case is about various instances of scientific misconduct by a psychiatrist. The scientific misconduct ranges from stealing research funds from the government for personal use to the fabrication of data. The psychiatrist is now banned from research funding for two years and must correct or retract four of his previously published papers. <br /> |
<references /> | <references /> | ||
| − | |Important Because= | + | |Important Because=Data fabrication in clinical trials endangers the health of both current participants and future patients that will be treated with the drug if it is ‘proven’ efficacious. In addition, data fabrication lowers public trust in science. Moreover, data fabrication and stealing of funding money for personal use may lead to the waste of precious research funding budgets on unscientific research. |
|Important For=Researchers | |Important For=Researchers | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Related To | {{Related To | ||
| − | |Related To Theme=Theme:28a0859b-9e52-4af4-97f0-b0f8eeac1f1c | + | |Related To Theme=Theme:28a0859b-9e52-4af4-97f0-b0f8eeac1f1c;Theme:5f65272f-6e95-4768-8236-bc821a97f3d8 |
}} | }} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
|Has Timepoint=31-12-2019 | |Has Timepoint=31-12-2019 | ||
|Has Location=USA; United States | |Has Location=USA; United States | ||
| − | |Has Virtue And Value=Honesty; Respect | + | |Has Virtue And Value=Honesty; Respect; Transparency; Integrity |
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Grant applications | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Grant applications | ||
|Related To Research Area=Clinical medicine | |Related To Research Area=Clinical medicine | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 18:13, 28 June 2021
ResourcesCases
Misrepresenting the characteristics of research participants in psychiatric studies
What is this about?
This factual case is about various instances of scientific misconduct by a psychiatrist. The scientific misconduct ranges from stealing research funds from the government for personal use to the fabrication of data. The psychiatrist is now banned from research funding for two years and must correct or retract four of his previously published papers.
Why is this important?
Data fabrication in clinical trials endangers the health of both current participants and future patients that will be treated with the drug if it is ‘proven’ efficacious. In addition, data fabrication lowers public trust in science. Moreover, data fabrication and stealing of funding money for personal use may lead to the waste of precious research funding budgets on unscientific research.
