Difference between revisions of "Resource:A6bae807-a521-46c4-a7ba-79c1fe163421"

From The Embassy of Good Science
(Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Cases |Title=Getting a Fair Shake? |Is About=. |Important Because=. |Important For=Researchers }} {{Link |Has Link=https://ori.hhs.gov/content/case-t...")
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Title=Getting a Fair Shake?
 
|Title=Getting a Fair Shake?
|Is About=.
+
|Is About=This fictional case is about Gail, an Associoate Professor. Gail submitted a proposal which recieved a score too low to be funded. She is wondering what she should do now, because  she is certain that her method will work.
|Important Because=.
+
|Important Because=The current peer review system may not work positive for everybody. It is important how to react when your proposal as a researcher is rejected for funding without deception.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Website
 
|Important For=Researchers
 
|Important For=Researchers
 
}}
 
}}
Line 12: Line 15:
 
{{Tags
 
{{Tags
 
|Has Virtue And Value=Reliability
 
|Has Virtue And Value=Reliability
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Communication
+
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Communication; Research methods
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 14:12, 6 May 2020

Cases

Getting a Fair Shake?

What is this about?

This fictional case is about Gail, an Associoate Professor. Gail submitted a proposal which recieved a score too low to be funded. She is wondering what she should do now, because she is certain that her method will work.

Why is this important?

The current peer review system may not work positive for everybody. It is important how to react when your proposal as a researcher is rejected for funding without deception.


Website

For whom is this important?

Other information

Virtues & Values
Good Practices & Misconduct
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6