Difference between revisions of "Resource:A9e1f468-b56b-4ae5-91fe-20024d43e154"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
{{Related To}} | {{Related To}} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
| + | |Has Timepoint=2010 | ||
|Has Location=Sweden | |Has Location=Sweden | ||
|Has Virtue And Value=Honesty; Reliability; Accountability | |Has Virtue And Value=Honesty; Reliability; Accountability | ||
Revision as of 16:05, 10 February 2020
ResourcesCases
Scientific misconduct at an elite medical institute: The role of competing institutional logics and fragmented control
What is this about?
This paper builds on the concepts of competing logics and institutional fields to analyze a serious case of medical and scientific misconduct at a leading research institute, Karolinska in Sweden, home to the Nobel Prize in Medicine[1].
Why is this important?
The incidence of revealed fraud and dishonesty in academia is on the rise, and so is the number of studies seeking to explain scientific misconduct[1].
