Difference between revisions of "Resource:A9e1f468-b56b-4ae5-91fe-20024d43e154"

From The Embassy of Good Science
Line 11: Line 11:
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Related To
 
{{Related To
|Related To Resource=Resource:D303f2ff-021f-4b2e-a145-f7b441e35830;Resource:226c89f1-a061-4bb0-8ec4-79583de2ddf0
+
|Related To Resource=Resource:226c89f1-a061-4bb0-8ec4-79583de2ddf0
 
|Related To Theme=Theme:28a0859b-9e52-4af4-97f0-b0f8eeac1f1c
 
|Related To Theme=Theme:28a0859b-9e52-4af4-97f0-b0f8eeac1f1c
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 16:38, 21 October 2020

Cases

Scientific Misconduct at an Elite Medical Institute: The Role of Competing Institutional Logics and Fragmented Control

What is this about?

This is a factual case.

Why is this important?


For whom is this important?

Other information

When
Where
Good Practices & Misconduct
Research Area
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6