Difference between revisions of "Resource:Af266b39-20a3-4b97-a876-08eebb428fe6"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Cases |Title=Misconduct ruling is silent on intent |Is About=Mavens of research ethics often insist that there is a clear difference between sloppy s...") |
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Title=Misconduct ruling is silent on intent | |Title=Misconduct ruling is silent on intent | ||
|Is About=Mavens of research ethics often insist that there is a clear difference between sloppy science and scientific fraud. But if ever there was a case that blurs that line, it is that of Marc Hauser, a high-flying evolutionary psychologist who resigned from Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, in 2011, after the university found him guilty of misconduct<ref>https://www.nature.com/news/misconduct-ruling-is-silent-on-intent-1.11390</ref>. | |Is About=Mavens of research ethics often insist that there is a clear difference between sloppy science and scientific fraud. But if ever there was a case that blurs that line, it is that of Marc Hauser, a high-flying evolutionary psychologist who resigned from Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, in 2011, after the university found him guilty of misconduct<ref>https://www.nature.com/news/misconduct-ruling-is-silent-on-intent-1.11390</ref>. | ||
| + | <references /> | ||
|Important Because=The definition of misconduct can be interpreted in different ways. | |Important Because=The definition of misconduct can be interpreted in different ways. | ||
|Important For=researchers; phd students; research leaders | |Important For=researchers; phd students; research leaders | ||
| Line 11: | Line 12: | ||
{{Related To}} | {{Related To}} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
| + | |Has Timepoint=2002; 2010 | ||
|Has Location=USA | |Has Location=USA | ||
|Has Virtue And Value=Reliability; Honesty | |Has Virtue And Value=Reliability; Honesty | ||
Revision as of 16:04, 10 February 2020
ResourcesCases
Misconduct ruling is silent on intent
What is this about?
Mavens of research ethics often insist that there is a clear difference between sloppy science and scientific fraud. But if ever there was a case that blurs that line, it is that of Marc Hauser, a high-flying evolutionary psychologist who resigned from Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, in 2011, after the university found him guilty of misconduct[1].
Why is this important?
The definition of misconduct can be interpreted in different ways.
