Difference between revisions of "Resource:Af266b39-20a3-4b97-a876-08eebb428fe6"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
| − | |||
|Has Timepoint=2002; 2010 | |Has Timepoint=2002; 2010 | ||
|Has Location=USA; United States | |Has Location=USA; United States | ||
Revision as of 18:49, 25 October 2020
ResourcesCases
Misconduct Ruling is Silent on Intent
What is this about?
Mavens of research ethics often insist that there is a clear difference between sloppy science and scientific fraud. But if ever there was a case that blurs that line, it is that of a high-flying evolutionary psychologist who resigned from Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, in 2011, after the university found him guilty of misconduct[1]. This is a factual case.
- ↑ Reich, Eugenie Samuel. "Misconduct ruling is silent on intent." Nature 489.7415 (2012): 189.
Why is this important?
The definition of misconduct can be interpreted in different ways.
