Misconduct ruling is silent on intent
From The Embassy of Good Science
Revision as of 11:21, 25 January 2020 by Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Cases |Title=Misconduct ruling is silent on intent |Is About=Mavens of research ethics often insist that there is a clear difference between sloppy s...")
ResourcesCases
Misconduct ruling is silent on intent
What is this about?
Mavens of research ethics often insist that there is a clear difference between sloppy science and scientific fraud. But if ever there was a case that blurs that line, it is that of Marc Hauser, a high-flying evolutionary psychologist who resigned from Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, in 2011, after the university found him guilty of misconduct[1].
Why is this important?
The definition of misconduct can be interpreted in different ways.
