Difference between revisions of "Resource:B2456a64-b3e1-4d36-866e-a3ba117633e9"
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Cases |Title=Handling of scientific dishonesty in the Nordic countries |Is About=Scientific dishonesty in medical research has received increased att...") |
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
| + | <references /> | ||
|Important Because=Despite a widely recognised need, most countries still have no coherent system to deal with scientific misconduct Committees have been established by the national medical research councils in Denmark (1992), Norway (1994), and Sweden (1997), and by the Ministry of Education in Finland (1994), to deal with scientific misconduct—ie, to initiate preventive measures, to investigate alleged cases, or both<ref>https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(98)07133-5/fulltext</ref>. | |Important Because=Despite a widely recognised need, most countries still have no coherent system to deal with scientific misconduct Committees have been established by the national medical research councils in Denmark (1992), Norway (1994), and Sweden (1997), and by the Ministry of Education in Finland (1994), to deal with scientific misconduct—ie, to initiate preventive measures, to investigate alleged cases, or both<ref>https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(98)07133-5/fulltext</ref>. | ||
| + | <references /> | ||
|Important For=researchers; research leaders | |Important For=researchers; research leaders | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 13: | Line 15: | ||
{{Related To}} | {{Related To}} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
| + | |Has Timepoint=1992-1999 | ||
|Has Location=Norway; Finland; Sweden; Denmark | |Has Location=Norway; Finland; Sweden; Denmark | ||
|Has Virtue And Value=Honesty | |Has Virtue And Value=Honesty | ||
Revision as of 16:02, 10 February 2020
ResourcesHandling of scientific dishonesty in the Nordic countries
What is this about?
Scientific dishonesty in medical research has received increased attention over recent years. A survey among 274 medical scientists in Norway showed that 22% knew about cases of serious misconduct, and 3% were aware of falsification or fabrication of data. 9% of the respondents had themselves contributed to one or more incidents of misconduct[1].
Why is this important?
Despite a widely recognised need, most countries still have no coherent system to deal with scientific misconduct Committees have been established by the national medical research councils in Denmark (1992), Norway (1994), and Sweden (1997), and by the Ministry of Education in Finland (1994), to deal with scientific misconduct—ie, to initiate preventive measures, to investigate alleged cases, or both[1].
