Difference between revisions of "Resource:C2463c3c-c2d8-4884-8f7a-84b4d7d4cb3b"

From The Embassy of Good Science
(Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Guidelines |Title=Research integrity practices in Science Europe member organizations |Is About=Research integrity practices in Science Europe member...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Resource
 
{{Resource
|Resource Type=Guidelines
+
|Resource Type=Other
|Title=Research integrity practices in Science Europe member organizations
+
|Title=Research Integrity Practices in Science Europe Member Organizations
|Is About=Research integrity practices in Science Europe member organizations: report
+
|Is About=This report presents the results of a survey of Scientific Europe member organisations, undertaken in 2014 by the Working Group on Research Integrity. The aim of the survey was to map existing policies, procedures and practices for promoting research integrity and preventing and sanctioning misconduct, in the context of member organisations activities
 +
|Important Because=Research integrity is at the core of the research endeavour. It is the basis for researchers’ trust in each other and in the research record and, equally importantly, society’s trust in research. There are many reasons to take research integrity seriously including research excellence and an unsullied research record; continuing societal support for public investment in research; avoiding harmful impacts and research waste etc. (cf. Science Europe Working Group on Research Integrity 2015)
 +
 
 +
Science Europe Working Group on Research Integrity (2015), Seven Reasons to Care about Research Integrity: <nowiki>http://scieur.org/integrity</nowiki>
 +
 
 +
<br />
 
|Important For=All stakeholders in research
 
|Important For=All stakeholders in research
 
}}
 
}}
Line 8: Line 13:
 
|Has Link=https://www.scienceeurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Science-_Europe_Integrity_Survey_Report_July_2016_FINAL.pdf
 
|Has Link=https://www.scienceeurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Science-_Europe_Integrity_Survey_Report_July_2016_FINAL.pdf
 
}}
 
}}
{{Related To}}
+
{{Related To
{{Tags}}
+
|Related To Resource=Resource:5bbdd729-8f96-432a-a0ee-56510e343d01;Resource:60bf1373-f7e1-4831-b3e9-cf6e60cc290f
 +
|Related To Theme=Theme:8c79e235-8481-45ea-bb57-c744dedbbb8a;Theme:E30b6f25-2071-4f6c-80ed-7c22f9d0e4ab
 +
}}
 +
{{Tags
 +
|Involves=Science Europe
 +
|Has Timepoint=2016
 +
|Has Location=Europe
 +
|Has Virtue And Value=Honesty; Reliability
 +
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Whistleblowers; Sanctions; Collaborative science; Self-assessment; Research Misconduct; Authorship; Conflict of Interest; Bias; Supervision; Environment
 +
}}

Revision as of 10:05, 14 August 2020

Other

Research Integrity Practices in Science Europe Member Organizations

What is this about?

This report presents the results of a survey of Scientific Europe member organisations, undertaken in 2014 by the Working Group on Research Integrity. The aim of the survey was to map existing policies, procedures and practices for promoting research integrity and preventing and sanctioning misconduct, in the context of member organisations activities

Why is this important?

Research integrity is at the core of the research endeavour. It is the basis for researchers’ trust in each other and in the research record and, equally importantly, society’s trust in research. There are many reasons to take research integrity seriously including research excellence and an unsullied research record; continuing societal support for public investment in research; avoiding harmful impacts and research waste etc. (cf. Science Europe Working Group on Research Integrity 2015)

Science Europe Working Group on Research Integrity (2015), Seven Reasons to Care about Research Integrity: http://scieur.org/integrity


For whom is this important?

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6