Difference between revisions of "Resource:Deca5ee1-560a-4b03-8656-4f2026c4ebfc"

From The Embassy of Good Science
(Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Cases |Title=Political points |Is About=A researcher is unsure how to disseminate potentially controversial findings regarding needle exchange progra...")
 
 
Line 13: Line 13:
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Tags
 
{{Tags
|Has Virtue And Value=Accountability; Reliabiity; Honesty
+
|Has Virtue And Value=Accountability; Honesty; Reliability
 
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Research methodology; Risk; Experimental design
 
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Research methodology; Risk; Experimental design
 
|Related To Research Area=LS 07.09 - Public health and epidemiology
 
|Related To Research Area=LS 07.09 - Public health and epidemiology
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 17:13, 6 April 2021

Cases

Political points

What is this about?

A researcher is unsure how to disseminate potentially controversial findings regarding needle exchange programs and HIV infection rates.

For whom is this important?

Other information

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6